Chronic liver disease incidence is increasing among children worldwide due to a multitude of epidemiological changes. Most of these chronic insults to the pediatric liver progress to fibrosis and cirrhosis to different degrees. Liver and immune physiology differs significantly in children from adults. Because most of pediatric liver diseases have no definitive therapy, a better understanding of population and disease-specific fibrogenesis is mandatory. Furthermore, fibrosis development has prognostic significance and often guide treatment. Evaluation of liver fibrosis continues to rely on the gold-standard liver biopsy. However, many high-quality studies put forward the high diagnostic accuracy of numerous diagnostic modalities in this setting. Herein, we summarize and discuss the recent literature on fibrogenesis with an emphasis on pediatric physiology along with a detailed outline of disease-specific signatures, noninvasive diagnostic modalities, and the potential for antifibrotic therapies.
· Chronic liver diseases in children are heterogenous but converge in the common pathway of fibrosis.
· Much of the literature on mechanisms of fibrogenesis focus on adults but pediatric physiology has documented differences.
· Understanding of these distinctions are necessary to define, treat, and prevent fibrosis.
· Current management of liver fibrosis relies heavily on liver biopsy. Multiple tools have shown high diagnostic performance in pediatric and adult populations. Large, multicenter studies are needed for validation.
Graphical abstract.
HSC, hepatic stellate cell; ECM, excess extracellular matrix; ROS, reactive oxygen species; ER, endoplasmic reticulum; IFALD, intestinal failure-associated liver disease; NAFLD-NASH, nonalcoholic fatty liver disease-nonalcoholic steatohepatitis; AIH, autoimmune hepatitis; CHF, congestive heart failure; METAVIR, metaanalysis of histological data in viral hepatitis; VCTE, vibration-controlled transient elastography; USG, ultrasonography; MR, magnetic resonance; FXR, farnesoid X receptor; NK, natural killer; TIMP, tissue inhibitors for metalloproteinases.
Introduction
The incidence of chronic liver disease (CLD) is increasing among children worldwide owing to a multitude of epidemiological changes, such as the opioid epidemic for hepatitis C infection and obesity epidemic for nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) [1]. The overall incidence of liver disease in infants is 1 in 2,500, while in 2021, children represented 13% of all liver transplantations (LTs) in the US [2,3]. CLDs in pediatrics are heterogeneous and span a wide range of pathologies ranging from congenital or metabolic disorders to autoimmune diseases and viral diseases. Most chronic insults to the pediatric liver have the potential to progress to fibrosis and cirrhosis to different degrees.
The pathophysiology of fibrosis is a well-researched area with significant focus on novel biomarkers and antifibrotic treatments, especially in the adult population. Little is known about how this pathophysiology differs in the pediatric population, which has a unique hepatic and immune milieu. Moreover, certain pathologies in the pediatric population are distinct and characterized by different rates of fibrosis progression. For instance, fibrosis requires months to occur in all patients but neonates [4].
Depending on the etiology, follow-up of liver fibrosis is often required to define treatment goals. However, liver biopsy remains the gold-standard tool for this purpose despite its limitations such as invasiveness, complications, and inadequate sampling. Therefore, research has focused on noninvasive modalities and potential predictive biomarkers, and a review of these efforts in the pediatric population is required.
This article will outline the distinctions between adult and pediatric liver fibrosis with specific emphasis on pathophysiology, individual pediatric diseases, diagnostic modalities, and the ongoing search for therapeutic strategies for liver fibrosis.
Mechanisms of liver fibrosis
Liver fibrosis involves replacement of the hepatic parenchyma by excess extracellular matrix (ECM) as part of a wound healing response to chronic hepatic or bile duct injury [5]. The deposition of fibrillar collagen (i.e., collagen I, collagen III, and fibronectin) and unusual ECM proteins (e.g., chondroitin-sulfate rich proteoglycans) results in altered liver microarchitecture. These structural changes impede the bidirectional flow of plasma between the sinusoidal lumen and hepatocytes, resulting in further hepatic compromise [6].
In the liver, the major event that drives fibrogenesis is the activation and differentiation of hepatic stellate cells (HSCs) into α-smooth muscle actin (α-SMA)–positive myofibroblasts (MFs) with high profibrogenic capacity. In the normal liver, HSCs reside in the subendothelial space of Disse, the interface between hepatocytes and sinusoids, and store fat and vitamin A [7]. In a 2013 monumental study, HSCs were the major source of MFs in HSC-marked Cre-transgenic mouse models of toxic, cholestatic, and fatty liver disease [8]. In addition to the central role of HSC in fibrosis, recent studies revealed that multiple molecular and cellular processes are involved in this dynamic process (Fig. 1). Although experimental data are scarce, the pathophysiological steps outlined above may differ in multiple ways in the pediatric population (Fig. 2).
Pediatric liver diseases
Pediatric liver disease spans a large spectrum of diseases with heterogeneous pathophysiology, age range, and course. Liver diseases are hereditary except for NAFLD, viral hepatitis, primary sclerosing cholangitis (PSC), and autoimmune liver disease. Accordingly, the potential of these diseases to lead to fibrosis is different. Biliary atresia (BA), intestinal failure-associated liver disease (IFALD), and certain metabolic/genetic liver diseases characteristically begin in the neonatal period and manifest significant fibrosis early. Others, such as Alagille syndrome and autosomal recessive polycystic kidney disease, despite having a neonatal or even prenatal onset, present with fibrosis in older children. Table 1 summarizes the characteristics of chronic pediatric liver pathologies associated with fibrosis [6].
1. Cholestatic injury1) Biliary atresia
BA is a progressive fibroinflammatory disease involving a segment or the entire extrahepatic biliary tree that leads to obliteration of the affected bile ducts within the first 3 months of life. To date, the exact pathophysiology of BA has remained elusive with a focus on environmental insults, immunologic dysregulation, genetic susceptibility, and developmental defects. The current hypothesis endorses a viral insult, leading to overactivation of the immune system. Fibrosis in BA is unique in that it progresses rapidly, leading to cirrhosis within a few weeks of birth in untreated cases. Kasai portoenterostomy (KPE) bypasses the atretic extrahepatic bile ducts and restores bile flow. The therapeutic outcome of KPE was evaluated using serum bilirubin levels at 6 months postoperative. Despite a good clinical response to KPE, liver fibrosis in BA often progresses to cirrhosis, requiring LT. In different series published worldwide, the rate of needing LT after KPE was 45%–70% at 5 years. Research has focused on identifying prognostic indicators in the post-KPE setting to predict progression to fibrosis and cirrhosis [9,10].
2) Primary sclerosing cholangitis
PSC is a chronic fibroinflammatory disorder of the intrahepatic and/or extrahepatic bile ducts of unknown etiology. The development of fibrosis is significant in pediatric PSC [11-16]. Despite the inconspicuous symptoms at presentation, such as fatigue and favorable magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography scores, the majority of pediatric patients have significant fibrosis in the initial liver biopsy [17,18]. Around 1%–2% of adults, but 17%–30% of children progress to advanced liver disease and require LT each year [12,19]. In a large multicenter study of 781 children, Deneau et al. [11] found that a high fibrosis scoring aspartate transaminase (AST) to platelet ratio index (APRI) portends a poor prognosis.
No treatment options to date, such as oral vancomycin or ursodeoxycholic acid, are associated with improved fibrosis in pediatric PSC [20,21]. Haisma et al. [22] performed a genome-wide association study of 29 patient-parent trios with PSC onset at ≤12 years of age. They found pathogenic variants in 22 of 29 of patients and that some of the genes were involved in transmembrane transport, adaptive and innate immunity, and epithelial barrier function. On the other hand, adult genome studies identified most adult-onset susceptibility genes to the human leukocyte antigen complex II locus [23,24]. Therefore, pediatric PSC may represent a heterogeneous disease characterized by differing mechanisms and potential for fibrosis that may benefit from individualized treatment.
3) Alagille syndrome
Alagille syndrome is a multisystem disorder of morphogenesis that characteristically involves cholestasis, heart murmur, structural heart disease, dysmorphic facial features, vertebral anomalies, and optical findings. Through a mutation in the JAG1 gene on chromosome 20, commonly NOTCH2, the Notch signaling pathway is perturbed, resulting in complex developmental manifestations [25]. Liver involvement in Alagille syndrome is characterized by bile duct paucity, cholestasis, and fibrosis. Although the liver disease may improve with age, 43.5%–76% of patients reportedly require LT by adulthood [26-28].
Defective Notch signaling associated with Alagille syndrome has guided our understanding of biliary fibrosis. Upon injury, hepatic progenitor cells (HPCs) are activated and have the capacity to differentiate into hepatocyte as well as biliary epithelial cells in hepatocellular and biliary injury, respectively. Jagged-1 expressing portal MFs mediate the differentiation of HPCs upstream of Notch signaling. The outcome of Alagille syndrome is a scarcity of reactive ductular cells, resulting in thinner portal septa and an abundance of intermediate hepatic-biliary cells that promote intralobular chicken wire fibrosis [29,30].
Most children acquire hepatitis B virus (HBV) and/or hepatitis C virus (HCV) infections in infancy, with 90% and 60% developing chronic infections, respectively [31,32]. Overall, chronic HCV infection in children follows an indolent course with low-level fibrosis. In 2 cohorts of 121 and 332 children, only 2 and 6 children developed cirrhosis in longitudinal follow-up, respectively [33,34]. Despite vaccination, HPV remains an important source of mortality and morbidity in children in the United States. In a study of histological specimens collected from 134 children, fibrosis and cirrhosis were present in 82% and 4%, respectively. In another study of 292 HBV-infected children, cirrhosis occurred in 3% at a median of 4 years of age [35,36].
In chronic HBV, Łotowska and Lebensztejn [37] found a positive correlation between the number of SMA-positive HSCs and fibrosis stage. The same group performed an ultrastructural phenotype analysis of chronic HBV biopsies and documented shifts in 2 cell types in children with advanced fibrosis: quiescent HSCs were replaced with transitional and MF-like HSCs and damaged liver progenitor cells in close proximity to the HSCs [38-40]. Close monitoring of fibrosis progression guides clinical decisions to begin antiviral therapy in these patients to prevent ongoing fibrosis [41].
2) Autoimmune hepatitis
Autoimmune hepatitis (AIH) is a chronic inflammatory disease of the liver characterized by hypergammaglobulinemia and autoantibody positivity. AIH is an important consideration in childhood liver fibrosis since one-third of patients present with cirrhosis and its complications [42,43]. Maia et al. [44] performed immunohistochemical examinations of pediatric AIH liver biopsies and noted that the activation of HSC populations decreased significantly following therapy. Studies involving follow-up biopsies in 16 and 13 pediatric patients with AIH demonstrated regression of fibrosis over 6–12 months [45,46].
NAFLD is a disease spectrum that ranges from hepatocyte steatosis to nonalcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH) to fibrosis and ultimately cirrhosis [47]. Fibrosis in NAFLD-NASH is perhaps the most studied pathophysiology in terms of mechanisms, diagnostics, and therapeutics. Atsawarungruangkit et al. [48] performed transient elastography-based screenings of 740 US adolescents embedded within the 2017–2018 National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey and identified advanced fibrosis secondary to NAFLD in 2.84%. According to an evaluation of liver biopsies from 100 children with NAFLD, 2 phenotypes of pediatric NASH exist: type I, with lobular inflammation and perisinusoidal fibrosis (17% of biopsies); and type II, with portal inflammation and fibrosis (51% of biopsies) [49]. Notably, children with the type II phenotype had more significant fibrosis.
The factors involved in driving the progression of NAFLD to fibrosis have been extensively evaluated. The 2 consistent risk factors for fibrosis development are metabolic syndrome and waist circumference [50-52]. Genetic variation is another source of wide study. Recently, Tao et al. performed a meta-analysis of 42 studies (>1 million participants), including 10 pediatric studies, to assess the role of rs641738C>T in MBOAT7. Although the variant was associated with advanced fibrosis on biopsy, its functional implications remain unclear. Another widely established variant is the rs738409 polymorphism in PNPLA3/adiponutrin. A meta-analysis of 5 studies with histological fibrosis assessments showed a significant association between advanced fibrosis and the variant [53]. In a study of 54 patients with NAFLD, those carrying the PNPLA3 variant had more periportal/portal fibrosis, hepatic progenitor cell activation, and serum oxidative stress [54]. Whether these findings can be applied to other etiologies could pose a worthwhile research question.
Environmental influences, such as dysbiosis and in utero exposure to a maternal Western diet, are related not only to NAFLD, but also to early liver fibrosis. NASH et al. recently demonstrated that nonhuman primate fetuses exposed to a maternal Western-style diet displayed increased fibrillar collagen deposition in the liver periportal region with localized HSC and MF activation. In a similar model, Friedman et al. [55] prevented collagen fibril formation in the offspring of mice fed a Westernstyle diet through a potent antioxidant, pyrroloquinoline quinone, which reversed macrophage metabolic programming from oxidative to glycolytic pathways and improved gut tight junction expression. Therefore, dietary modulation may be an important intervention for all patients with liver diseases.
2) Intestinal failure-associated liver disease
IFALD encompasses a spectrum of liver diseases, including steatosis, cholestasis, and fibrosis, in patients with intestinal failure and long-term use of parenteral nutrition (PN) [56]. It reportedly affects 22%–30% of such children according to clinical diagnoses [57,58]. However, in a recent study, surveillance biopsies in children receiving PN revealed an abnormal histology in 94% and 77% during and after PN, respectively. Of them, 88% and 64% had portal/periportal fibrosis [59]. The causes of IFALD are still being delineated with potential culprits involving plant sterols in PN lipid emulsion, gut dysbiosis, impaired barrier function, and episodes of sepsis. The fibrotic liver milieu in IFALD, even after weaning from PN, has been characterized by α-SMA+HSCs, increased collagen expression, and profibrotic/inflammatory cytokines, such as interleukin (IL)1a, IL1b, epithelial growth factor, adhesion molecule integrin-β6, and matrix metalloprotein (MMP)9 [60-62].
Congenital hepatic fibrosis is mostly associated with autosomal recessive polycystic kidney disease and a PKHD1 gene mutation that encodes for the transmembrane protein fibrocystin/polyductin, is localized to cilia, and is involved in the development of the renal collecting duct and biliary system [63]. Therefore, the characteristic pathological lesion in the liver is a ductal plate malformation, in which irregular biliary channels persist around the portal tracts [64]. Fibrosis can be severe, forming thick white bands of fibrous tissue across hepatocyte cell islands [65]. Mutation type affecting the PKHD1 gene determines the severity of associated polycystic kidney disease but not congenital hepatic fibrosis [66]. LT outcomes are promising, with good kidney and liver function, even in related living donor LT [67,68].
2) Cystic fibrosis liver disease
Cystic fibrosis (CF) liver disease (CFLD), which develops in 5–10% of patients with CF, is characterized by progressive hepatobiliary fibrosis. In a recent cohort study of 3,328 CF patients, of whom 32.2% and 10% developed CFLD and severe CFLD by 30 years of age, respectively [69]. Lewindon et al. [70] longitudinally followed 41 patients with CF and found that fibrosis at baseline biopsies, but not clinical or imaging abnormalities, heralded the development of clinically significant CFLD/portal hypertension.
However, the patchy nature of disease sampling may be inadequate for quantifying fibrosis. For the noninvasive diagnosis of liver fibrosis, Pereira et al. [71] correlated various serum markers of fibrosis in a cohort of 36 children with CFLD. Lewindon et al. [72] investigated the diagnostic performance of vibration-controlled transient elastography (VCTE) and APRI/Fibrosis-4 (FIB-4) Index for staging fibrosis in 27 and 51 children, respectively. In these studies, VCTE (area under the receiver operating characteristic curve [AUROC], 0.89), APRI (AUROC, 0.83), and prolyl hydroxylase (AUROC, 0.81) were superior to others in determining a meta-analysis of histological data in viral hepatitis (METAVIR) score ≥ F3 and Scheuer stage ≥2 fibrosis [72,73]. Future studies should provide clinical benefits to this patient group owing to the silent progression of fibrosis.
3) Fontan-associated liver disease
Fontan-associated liver disease (FALD) represents a congestive hepatopathy related to elevated central venous pressures that follow the Fontan operation and final-stage surgical palliation for univentricular physiology through complete cavopulmonary shunt creation [74]. According to studies on surveillance biopsies, nearly all biopsied patients develop significant fibrosis during adolescence [75]. Among our cohort of Fontan patients, FALD was detected in 87.5%. Liver stiffness showed a significant positive correlation with post-Fontan duration (P<0.05, r=0.550) and the FIB-4 index (r=0.7, P<0.05) but not with APRI. Splenomegaly (P<0.01, r=0.669), APRI (P<0.01, r=0.767), and FIB-4 index (P<0.01, r=0.922) were all correlated with postFontan duration, implying the importance of universal screening depending on the timing after surgery.
4) Fibrosis in LT
Owing to the improvements in post-LT care, the 10-year patient and graft survival rates in pediatric LT are 83% and 73%, respectively [76]. However, progressive liver fibrosis is among the most common causes of liver allograft failure in the pediatric group, reaching as high as 69%–97% according to different centers [77-81]. Both alloimmune inflammation and biliary outflow obstruction contribute to ongoing fibrosis [5]. Alterations in the gut microbiome and intestinal permeability are potential contributors through pathogen-associated molecular pattern translocation and pattern recognition receptor activation, abnormal bile acid metabolism, and short-chain fatty acid imbalances [82]. According to sequential allograft biopsies in the study by Varma et al. [83], the histological lesion begins with portal inflammation and progresses to periportal fibrosis, followed by extension to adjacent portal fields. Small longitudinal studies have shown that intensification of immunosuppression after histological diagnosis of inflammation and fibrosis leads to a reduction in fibrosis scores [80,84]. To date, studies investigating noninvasive techniques for identifying liver fibrosis in post-LT settings found that VCTE was superior to acoustic radiation force impulse (ARFI) and serum biomarkers (e.g., AST/alanine transaminase [ALT] ratio, APRI, FibroTest [FT], and enhanced liver fibrosis test) [85].
Approach to diagnosis1. Liver biopsy
Liver biopsy is the ultimate tool used to evaluate liver fibrosis. However, a liver biopsy is often complicated by its cumbersome nature, inadequate sampling, and extended sampling time. Often, the fibrosis distribution is heterogeneous and may evolve quickly, such as in BA [86]. Studies of HCV-infected adults showed that fibrosis scoring varied depending on sampling site in 33%–45% of patients [87,88].
Fibrosis scoring systems facilitate the standardization and comparison of biopsies. To date, studies in children have utilized different scoring systems developed for evaluating fibrosis in adults and specific etiologies. These include the METAVIR (developed for hepatitis C scoring in adults), Ishak, Batts and Ludwig, Brunt, and Knodell classifications. The METAVIR as the most commonly used according to our review of the literature (68% of studies comparing biopsy grades with noninvasive tools). Each scoring system relies on the progressive development of periportal fibrosis. However, fibrosis in children may assume other patterns, such as chicken wire fibrosis within lobules, perisinusoidal involvement, patchy fibrosis, and more rapid development as in BA [89,90]. Therefore, diagnostic efforts have concentrated on the identification and validation of noninvasive and accurate tools for evaluating fibrosis.
2. Radiological assessment
Various radiological methods and their respective advantages and disadvantages are depicted in Table 2.
1) Vibration-controlled transient elastography
VCTE is the most commonly used modality for evaluating liver stiffness worldwide, with FibroScan (Echosens, Paris, France) being the most common product [91]. VCTE requires its own probe and relies on creating 50-Hz frequency vibrations to induce shear waves. The velocity at which the generated shear waves travel is directly related to liver stiffness and increases in stiffer tissue [92].
VCTE is the most well-studied modality for estimating liver fibrosis in adult and pediatric settings. In 2018, Hwang et al. [93] performed a meta-analysis of 11 studies involving 723 patients to investigate the correlation between liver fibrosis biopsies and VCTE measurements. The AUROC for detecting stage ≥F2 fibrosis was 0.96, which remained stable across subgroup analyses involving patients aged ≥8 years and study design.
Despite the high accuracy and reproducibility of liver stiffness measurements (LSMs), limitations exist. Studies of healthy children found that LSMs were higher with increasing age and in boys [94,95]. In addition, LSM cutoffs vary by etiology. Studies of heterogeneous patient populations found a cutoff level of 7.5–13 kPa for detecting stage ≥ F3/F4 fibrosis [96-99]. In studies of infants with BA, before KPE, the cutoffs were 9.8–23.2 kPa [100-102]. Therefore, validation studies in large cohorts with subgroup analyses are needed to improve the reliability and accuracy of VCTE in clinical practice.
2) Two-dimensional shear wave elastography and point shear wave elastography
Similar to VCTE, 2-dimensional shear wave elastography (2D-SWE) and point shear wave elastography (p-SWE) use shear waves created by the liver parenchyma that travel with higher velocity in a stiffer medium. In contrast to VCTE, 2D-SWE and p-SWE use ARFI to induce shear waves. Both modalities employ a regular ultrasound probe to take measurements; however, 2D-SWE samples have a larger area than p-SWE samples [103].
A 2016 meta-analysis of 13 articles on 2D-SWE in the diagnosis of liver fibrosis in adults found high sensitivity and specificity of 2D-SWE across all stages of fibrosis [104]. In a meta-analysis of 12 studies of 2D-SWE accuracy in fibrosis in children, Kim et al. [105] computed a summary sensitivity, specificity, and AUROC of 81%, 91%, and 0.93 for detecting stage ≥ F2 fibrosis, respectively. Median cutoff values for detecting significant fibrosis as summarized by Jiang et al. [104] and Kim et al. [105] were 8.0 kPa and 9.4 kPa in adults and children, respectively.
Individual studies have evaluated the diagnostic performance of 2D-SWE in disease groups and patients with potential confounders. Dhyani et al. [106] and Galina et al. [107] compared the accuracy and cutoff values of 2D-SWE across hepatocellular and cholestatic disease groups. They both found higher LSM cutoff values for detecting fibrosis in cholestatic groups. Chen et al. [108] did not report a significant difference between LSM cutoffs in BA and non-BA cholestatic infants, supporting that cholestasis, but not BA alone, impacts LSM. Moreover, Tutar and Alhashmi et al. found that steatosis increases the LSM cutoff and reduces overall performance of 2D-SWE, while in their cohort of 68 patients with NAFLD Garcovich et al. reported AUROC values of 0.92 and 0.97 for detecting stage ≥F1 and ≥F2 fibrosis, respectively [109-111]. Dardanelli et al. [112] identified hemosiderosis as a confounder of 2D-SWE.
Overall, p-SWE has been described as a tool with greater reliability than transient elastography but lower accuracy than 2D-SWE [113]. In their 2016 systematic review, Andersen et al. [114] included 6 studies that evaluated p-SWE versus liver biopsy performance. They found poor distinctive ability for no, mild, and moderate fibrosis and evidence of confounding by necroinflammatory activity. Our search revealed 3 additional publications with AUROC values of 0.83–0.86 for detecting METAVIR scores ≥F3 with cutoffs. Across all studies, the cutoff for detecting F3 fibrosis was 2.0–2.17 m/sec [115-117].
3) Magnetic resonance elastography
Similar to US-based techniques, magnetic resonance elastography (MRE) involves the creation and measurement of shear wave velocity that travels through the liver parenchyma. Propagating shear waves were measured using standard MR phase-contrast imaging sequences with added motion encoding gradients [118]. Performance statistics in previous adult studies were very promising as they found AUROC values of 0.83–0.99 and 0.84–1.0 for detecting stage ≥F2 and ≥F3 fibrosis, respectively [119]. To date, 3 large studies have evaluated the role of MRE in staging liver fibrosis, with AUROC values of 0.53–0.93 [120-122]. All studies were relatively uniform in terms of the patient population (age 13–14.2 years) and disease (mainly hepatocellular pattern). However, the accuracy and reliability of MRE in NAFLD was conflicting between the Trout and Schwimmer et al. studies, with AUROC values of 0.53 and 0.93 for this population, respectively.
3. Scores
Table 3 provides a brief overview of the studies that evaluated composite scores in pediatric settings.
1) APRI and FIB-4
The APRI and FIB-4 scores were initially developed to monitor liver fibrosis progression in adults with hepatitis C [123,124]. Both are calculated using basic biochemistry, making them more accessible and cost-effective than radiological modalities.
The APRI was calculated using serum AST and platelet counts. The advancement of fibrosis reduces platelet counts in 2 ways: by reducing thrombopoietin generation by hepatocytes; and hypersplenism. Meanwhile, AST increases as chronic injury drives its release from mitochondria, and fibrosis diminishes clearance [125-127]. This pathophysiological derangement occurs later in the disease course, explaining why APRI has not always been a sensitive tool for detecting mild to moderate fibrosis [33,34]. Finally, APRI requires the use of the standard upper limit of normal for AST, which is 40 IU/L in most pediatric studies. Nevertheless, children often have lower baseline enzyme levels, which introduces potential bias to the score [128].
The FIB-4 index considers age-related differences in enzymes and ALT in addition to the components of APRI [123]. Despite these additional elements, APRI consistently outperformed FIB-4 in detecting fibrosis in both children and adults with liver disease [73,129-135]. One exception was the prediction of portal hypertension in a cohort of patients with CFLD, in which the FIB-4 index (AUROC, 0.91) had a superior AUROC to the APRI (AUROC, 0.71) [73].
2) FibroTest
FT is another composite score developed for the noninvasive evaluation of fibrosis in adults with chronic HCV. The FT combines age, sex, and 5 common serum markers: total bilirubin, a2-macroglobulin, haptoglobin, and gamma-glutamyl transferase [136]. Overall, the validation of FT in the pediatric cohort has been limited to relatively small studies comprising children with various CLD or viral hepatitis and did not reveal consistency [136-140].
3) Pediatric NAFLD Fibrosis Index and Pediatric NAFLD Fibrosis Score
Two indices were developed for noninvasive evaluation of liver fibrosis in children with NAFLD: Pediatric NAFLD Fibrosis Index (PNFI) and Pediatric NAFLD Fibrosis Score (PNFS). PNFI is based on age, waist circumference, and triglyceride levels. In a development cohort of 203 patients, the AUROC for predicting fibrosis was 0.85 [141]. Subsequently, Alkhouri et al. utilized PNFI in combination with an enhanced liver fibrosis test (ELF; including hyaluronic acid, procollagen-3, and tissue inhibitor of metalloproteinases-1) and VCTE. In both studies, ELF and VCTE were superior to PNFI, with AUROC values of 0.618–0.761 for detecting various fibrosis levels [142,143]. Similarly, Yang et al. [134] found that, across multiple diagnostic tests, PNFI had the lowest AUROC value in a cohort of 77 children with NAFLD. In 2014, Alkhouri et al. [131] developed PNFS in a cohort of 242 children with biopsy-proven NAFLD, which included ALT, alkaline phosphatase, platelet count, and gamma-glutamyl transferase levels. The AUROC value for this score was 0.74 for detecting stage ≥F3 fibrosis. However, external validation of this tool is still lacking [144].
4. Serum biomarkers
Serum biomarkers for liver fibrosis have historically been classified as direct or indirect. Direct markers reflect ECM turnover, while indirect markers are proteins that are altered in the serum due to hepatic dysfunction [145]. Table 4 summarizes the most widely studied biomarkers in the pediatric population.
Therapy1. Fibrosis is reversible
Fibrosis was initially considered irreversible with permanent tissue scarring. However, there is now compelling evidence of its resolution in the liver. Patients with liver fibrosis due to AIH, Wilson disease, and viral hepatitis show its regression after adequate treatment of the underlying disease process [146]. This phenomenon hints at the inherent physiology of fibrosis turnover. The cessation of ongoing injury is key to resolving fibrosis. Subsequently, the hepatic immune milieu tips suppress inflammation and recruit restorative macrophages that express MMPs, growth factors, and phagocytosis-related receptors for ECM clearance [147]. With the loss of activating signals, MFs are targeted for apoptosis via natural killer and γδ T cell-mediated pathways [148].
2. Targeting ongoing liver injury
The resolution of fibrosis can interfere with ongoing injury. Unfortunately, despite progress in the molecular and genetic understanding of acquired and genetic liver disease in children, these conditions lack effective treatment except for a few such as viral hepatitis, autoimmune liver disease, and Wilson disease. Numerous trials investigating therapies directed at interfering with the disease process have incorporated liver fibrosis assessment as an endpoint. Several trials investigating the effect of metabolic modulation in NASH-NAFLD, such as through peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor-γ agonists (pioglitazone, rosiglitazone) on fibrosis regression, showed results ranging from decreased fibrosis to decreased fibrosis progression to no effect [149]. Similarly, ursodeoxycholic acid in primary biliary cirrhosis in a 4-year trial showed an overall improved rate of fibrosis progression, while a 2-year trial did not [149].
3. Antifibrotic therapies
Translational research on antifibrotic therapy has focused on targeting fibrosis and fibrolysis pathways [150]. Among the inhibitors of HSC activation (e.g., blockers of cannabinoid receptor 1 angiotensin-converting enzyme, angiotensin receptor, endothelin 1 receptor), the farnesoid X receptor (FXR) antagonist, obeticholic acid (OCA), has shown the greatest promise. FXR is strongly expressed in the liver and intestines and acts as a master transcriptional regulator of several enterohepatic metabolic pathways [151]. In a recent multicenter phase III study of 931 patients with F2–F3 fibrosis due to NASH, placebo, 10-mg OCA, and 25-mg OCA groups showed 12%, 18%, and 71% improvement rates in fibrosis [152]. Another approach is to eliminate HSCs through mechanisms that drive apoptosis. Selonsertib is a novel apoptosis signal-regulating kinase 1 inhibitor that promotes apoptosis and downregulates HSC activation. A phase II trial comparing 6 mg and 18 mg of selonsertib in patients with NASH fibrosis reported that 30% versus 43% of patients had improved fibrosis on repeat biopsies, but these results were not reproduced in trials involving patients with F3–F4 fibrosis [153,154]. Intracellularly acting to interfere with collagen production, pirfenidone has also demonstrated promising results in patients with HCV [155]. In this phase II trial, 67% of patients had improved fibrosis scores at the end of the 24-month period. In addition to pharmacological interventions, cellular therapies are being actively explored. In a novel in vivo study, engineered T cells programmed against a cardiac fibroblast activation protein demonstrated a significant reduction in cardiac fibrosis in mice [156].
Future directions and conclusion
The epidemiology and burden of CLD in children remains unknown. According to transplant registries and the World Health Organization, more than 500 children undergo LT, while approximately 30% die while awaiting LT [157,158]. As most pediatric liver diseases have no definitive therapy, a better understanding of disease-specific fibrogenesis is mandatory for this vulnerable population. Irrespective of the cause, a panoply of signals drives HSC activation. Additionally, crosstalk between liver sinusoidal endothelial cells, hepatic fibroblasts, macrophages, injured hepatocytes, and other cell types contributes to these mechanisms. The exact role of each cell type should be clarified by single-cell transcriptomic and proteomic studies.
Despite substantial progress and significant investment in the development of noninvasive markers of liver fibrosis, most have not yet been validated in children. Thus, there is an urgent need to develop effective and reliable noninvasive scoring systems to replace biopsies in children. In terms of pathological evaluation, digital pathology methods that leverage machine learning and artificial intelligence must be validated to obtain more prognostic information from liver biopsies.
In conclusion, liver fibrosis is a complex dynamic process involving parenchymal and nonparenchymal liver cells as well as immune cells. Further studies exploring cell-cell interactions and etiology-specific elements of fibrogenesis and their link to disease, as well as the mechanism of fibrosis resolution, are crucial to the development of more effective therapeutic targets.
Supplementary material
Supplementary Table can be found via https://doi.org/10.3345/cep.2022.00367.
Conflicts of interest
No potential conflict of interest relevant to this article was reported.
Funding
This study received no specific grant from any funding agency in the public, commercial, or not-for-profit sectors.
ReferencesKellyDAPaediatric liver disease: lessons for adult practice201723902AryaGBalistreriWFPediatric liver disease in the United States: epidemiology and impact2002175215Organ Procurement and Transplantation NetworkNational data [Internet]Richmond (VA)Organ Procurement and Transplantation Network2022[cited 2022 Sep 10]. Available from: https://optn.transplant.hrsa.gov/data/view-data-reports/national-data/AlbanisEFriedmanSLHEPATIC FIBROSIS: pathogenesis and principles of therapy2001531534v-viGeorgeMPaciPTanerTSignificance of progressive liver fibrosis in pediatric liver transplants: a review of current evidence202026198792WellsRGHepatic fibrosis in children and adults2017999101WakeK"Sternzellen" in the liver: perisinusoidal cells with special reference to storage of vitamin A197113242962MederackeIHsuCCTroegerJSHuebenerPMuXDapitoDHFate tracing reveals hepatic stellate cells as dominant contributors to liver fibrosis independent of its aetiology201342823SerinetMOWildhaberBEBrouéPLachauxASarlesJJacqueminEImpact of age at Kasai operation on its results in late childhood and adolescence: a rational basis for biliary atresia screening200912312806ChardotCBuetCSerinetMOGolmardJLLachauxARoquelaureBImproving outcomes of biliary atresia: French national series 1986-2009201358120917DeneauMJensenMKHolmenJWilliamsMSBookLSGutherySLPrimary sclerosing cholangitis, autoimmune hepatitis, and overlap in Utah children: epidemiology and natural history2013581392400FagundesEDTFerreiraARHoskenCCQueirozTCNPrimary sclerosing cholangitis in children and adolescents20175428691MilohTArnonRShneiderBSuchyFKerkarNA retrospective single-center review of primary sclerosing cholangitis in children2009723945ValentinoPLWigginsSHarneySRazaRLeeCKJonasMMThe natural history of primary sclerosing cholangitis in children: a large singlecenter longitudinal cohort study2016636039WiecekSWojtyniakAPindurBMachnikowska-SokołowskaMGruszczyńskaKGrzybowska-ChlebowczykUAnalysis of the clinical course of primary sclerosing cholangitis in paediatric population-single center study202157663YoonJOhSHKimHJParkSHYeBDYangSKPrimary sclerosing cholangitis with inflammatory bowel disease in Korean children20151826875CotterJMBrowneLPCapocelliKEMcCoyAMackCLLack of correlation of liver tests with fibrosis stage at diagnosis in pediatric primary sclerosing cholangitis20186622733BatresLARussoPMathewsMPiccoliDAChuangERuchelliEPrimary sclerosing cholangitis in children: a histologic follow-up study2005856876SørensenJNielsenOHAnderssonMAinsworthMAYttingHBélardEInflammatory bowel disease with primary sclerosing cholangitis: a Danish population-based cohort study 1977-201120183853241DeneauMRMackCMogulDPeritoERValentinoPLAmirAZOral vancomycin, ursodeoxycholic acid, or no therapy for pediatric primary sclerosing cholangitis: a matched analysis202173106173LabordaTJJensenMKKavanMDeneauMTreatment of primary sclerosing cholangitis in children2019111936HaismaSMWeersmaRKJoosseMEde KoningBAEde MeijTKootBGPExome sequencing in patient-parent trios suggests new candidate genes for early-onset primary sclerosing cholangitis202141104457KarlsenTHFrankeAMelumEKaserAHovJRBalschunTGenome-wide association analysis in primary sclerosing cholangitis2010138110211LiuJZHovJRFolseraasTEllinghausERushbrookSMDonchevaNTDense genotyping of immune-related disease regions identifies nine new risk loci for primary sclerosing cholangitis2013456705KohutTJGilbertMALoomesKMAlagille syndrome: a focused review on clinical features, genetics, and treatment20214152537KamathBMYinWMillerHAnandRRandEBAlonsoEOutcomes of liver transplantation for patients with Alagille syndrome: the studies of pediatric liver transplantation experience2012189408LykavierisPHadchouelMChardotCBernardOOutcome of liver disease in children with Alagille syndrome: a study of 163 patients2001494315VandrielSWangJSLiLPiccoliDALoomesKMSokalEClinical features and outcomes in an international cohort of 731 Alagille syndrome patients from 19 countries2019Nov812Boston (MA), USA. In: Hepatology 2019. http://hdl.handle.net/2078.1/222803FabrisLCadamuroMGuidoMSpirliCFiorottoRColledanMAnalysis of liver repair mechanisms in Alagille syndrome and biliary atresia reveals a role for notch signaling200717164153FiorottoRRaiznerAMorellCMTorselloBScirpoRFabrisLNotch signaling regulates tubular morphogenesis during repair from biliary damage in mice20135912430KarnsakulWSchwarzKBHepatitis B and C20176464158MacLachlanJHCowieBCHepatitis B virus epidemiology20155a021410GoodmanZDMakhloufHRLiuLBalistreriWGonzalez-PeraltaRPHaberBPathology of chronic hepatitis C in children: liver biopsy findings in the Peds-C Trial20084783643BortolottiFVerucchiGCammàCCabibboGZancanLIndolfiGLong-term course of chronic hepatitis C in children: from viral clearance to end-stage liver disease200813419007BortolottiFCalziaRCadrobbiPGiacchiniRCiravegnaBArmigliatoMLiver cirrhosis associated with chronic hepatitis B virus infection in childhood19861082247Rodriguez-BaezNMurrayKFKleinerDELingSCRosenthalPCarlinKHepatic histology in treatment-naïve children with chronic hepatitis B infection living in the United States and Canada20207199105ŁotowskaJMLebensztejnDMImmunoreactive hepatic stellate cells in biopsy material in children with chronic hepatitis B. The first report in pediatric patients20156622430LotowskaJMSobaniec-LotowskaMELebensztejnDMUltrastructural characteristics of the respective forms of hepatic stellate cells in chronic hepatitis B as an example of high fibroblastic cell plasticity. The first assessment in children20186312733LotowskaJMSobaniec-LotowskaMELebensztejnDMElectron microscopic alterations in intermediate hepatocyte-like cells in children with chronic hepatitis B: the first report in pediatric patients2010227417Sobaniec-LotowskaMELotowskaJMLebensztejnDMUltrastructure of oval cells in children with chronic hepatitis B, with special emphasis on the stage of liver fibrosis: the first pediatric study200713291822StraderDBWrightTThomasDLSeeffLBDiagnosis, management, and treatment of hepatitis C200439114771GregorioGVPortmannBReidFDonaldsonPTDohertyDGMcCartneyMAutoimmune hepatitis in childhood: a 20-year experience1997255417Mieli-VerganiGHellerSJaraPVerganiDChangMHFujisawaTAutoimmune hepatitis20094915864MaiaJMMaranhão HdeSSenaLVRochaLRMedeirosIARamosAMHepatic stellate cell activation and hepatic fibrosis in children with type 1 autoimmune hepatitis: an immunohistochemical study of paired liver biopsies before treatment and after clinical remission2010222649AbdallaAFZalataKRIsmailAFShihaGAttiyaMAbo-AlyazeedARegression of fibrosis in paediatric autoimmune hepatitis: morphometric assessment of fibrosis versus semiquantiatative methods200922SalemMEhsanNEl-BehairyBHusseinMSalamaERegression of liver fibrosis in children with autoimmune hepatitis who responded to immunosuppressant treatment200893Suppl 2pw572AggarwalAPuriKThangadaSZeinNAlkhouriNNonalcoholic fatty liver disease in children: recent practice guidelines, where do they take us?20141015161AtsawarungruangkitAElfanagelyYPanJAndersonKScharfenJPromratKPrevalence and risk factors of steatosis and advanced fibrosis using transient elastography in the United States' adolescent population202113790803SchwimmerJBBehlingCNewburyRDeutschRNievergeltCSchorkNJHistopathology of pediatric nonalcoholic fatty liver disease2005426419KimMJLeeKJAnalysis of the dietary factors associated with suspected pediatric nonalcoholic fatty liver disease and potential liver fibrosis: Korean National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey 2014-2017202020121TingYWWongSWAnuar ZainiAMohamedRJalaludinMYMetabolic syndrome is associated with advanced liver fibrosis among pediatric patients with non-alcoholic fatty liver disease20197491Moran-LevHCohenSWebbMYerushalmy-FelerAAmirAGalDLHigher BMI predicts liver fibrosis among obese children and adolescents with NAFLD - an interventional pilot study202121385XuRTaoAZhangSDengYChenGAssociation between patatin-like phospholipase domain containing 3 gene (PNPLA3) polymorphisms and nonalcoholic fatty liver disease: a HuGE review and meta-analysis201559284CarpinoGPastoriDBarattaFOveriDLabbadiaGPolimeniLPNPLA3 variant and portal/periportal histological pattern in patients with biopsy-proven non-alcoholic fatty liver disease: a possible role for oxidative stress2017715756FriedmanJEDobrinskikhEAlfonso-GarciaAFastAJanssenRCSoderborgTKPyrroloquinoline quinone prevents developmental programming of microbial dysbiosis and macrophage polarization to attenuate liver fibrosis in offspring of obese mice2018231328KhalafRTSokolRJNew insights into intestinal failure-associated liver disease in children202071148698LauritiGZaniAAufieriRCananziMChiesaPLEatonSIncidence, prevention, and treatment of parenteral nutrition-associated cholestasis and intestinal failure-associated liver disease in infants and children: a systematic review2014387085FitzgibbonsSCJonesBAHullMAZurakowskiDDuroDDugganCRelationship between biopsy-proven parenteralnutrition-associated liver fibrosis and biochemical cholestasis in children with short bowel syndrome201045959discussion 9MutanenALohiJHeikkiläPKoivusaloAIRintalaRJPakarinenMPPersistent abnormal liver fibrosis after weaning off parenteral nutrition in pediatric intestinal failure20135872938El KasmiKCAndersonALDevereauxMWVuePMZhangWSetchellKDPhytosterols promote liver injury and Kupffer cell activation in parenteral nutrition-associated liver disease20135206ra137MutanenALohiJHeikkiläPJalankoHPakarinenMPLiver inflammation relates to decreased canalicular bile transporter expression in pediatric onset intestinal failure20182683329MutanenALohiJSorsaTJalankoHPakarinenMPFeatures of liver tissue remodeling in intestinal failure during and after weaning off parenteral nutrition201616063242WardCJHoganMCRossettiSWalkerDSneddonTWangXThe gene mutated in autosomal recessive polycystic kidney disease encodes a large, receptor-like protein20023025969DesmetVJCongenital diseases of intrahepatic bile ducts: variations on the theme “ductal plate malformation”199216106983ZhuBDuZWangZLiYZhangJZhuHCongenital hepatic fibrosis in children and adults: clinical manifestations, management, and outcome-case series and literature review202020208284274Gunay-AygunMFont-MontgomeryELukoseLGersteinMTPiwnicaWormsKChoykePCharacteristics of congenital hepatic fibrosis in a large cohort of patients with autosomal recessive polycystic kidney disease201314411221e2ArikanCOzgencFAkmanSAKilicMTokatYYagciRVImpact of liver transplantation on renal function of patients with congenital hepatic fibrosis associated with autosomal recessive polycystic kidney disease2004855860IrieRNakazawaASakamotoSTakedaMYanagiYShimizuSLiving donor liver transplantation for congenital hepatic fibrosis in children20207034854BoëllePYDebrayDGuillotLClementACorvolHCystic fibrosis liver disease: outcomes and risk factors in a large cohort of french patients201969164856LewindonPJShepherdRWWalshMJGreerRMWilliamsonRPereiraTNImportance of hepatic fibrosis in cystic fibrosis and the predictive value of liver biopsy201153193201PereiraTNLewindonPJSmithJLMurphyTLLincolnDJShepherdRWSerum markers of hepatic fibrogenesis in cystic fibrosis liver disease20044157683LewindonPJPuertolas-LopezMVRammLENobleCPereiraTNWixeyJAAccuracy of transient elastography data combined with APRI in detection and staging of liver disease in pediatric patients with cystic fibrosis20191725619e5LeungDHKhanMMinardCGGuffeyDRammLECloustonADAspartate aminotransferase to platelet ratio and fibrosis-4 as biomarkers in biopsy-validated pediatric cystic fibrosis liver disease201562157683CowgillLDThe Fontan procedure: a historical review199151102630EmamaulleeJZaidiANSchianoTKahnJValentinoPLHoferREFontan-associated liver disease2020142591604MartinelliJHabesDMajedLGuettierCGonzalèsELinglartALong-term outcome of liver transplantation in childhood: a study of 20- year survivors20181816809EkongUDMelin-AldanaHSeshadriRLokarJHarrisDWhitingtonPFGraft histology characteristics in long-term survivors of pediatric liver transplantation20081415827EvansHMKellyDAMcKiernanPJHübscherSProgressive histological damage in liver allografts following pediatric liver transplantation200643110917FouquetVAlvesABranchereauSGrabarSDebrayDJacqueminELong-term outcome of pediatric liver transplantation for biliary atresia: a 10-year follow-up in a single center20051115260SanadaYMatsumotoKUrahashiTIharaYWakiyaTOkadaNProtocol liver biopsy is the only examination that can detect mid-term graft fibrosis after pediatric liver transplantation201420663850ScheenstraRPeetersPMVerkadeHJGouwASGraft fibrosis after pediatric liver transplantation: ten years of follow-up2009498806QinTFuJVerkadeHJThe role of the gut microbiome in graft fibrosis after pediatric liver transplantation202114070924VarmaSAmbroiseJKomutaMLatinneDBaldinPRedingRProgressive fibrosis is driven by genetic predisposition, allo-immunity, and inflammation in pediatric liver transplant recipients2016934655Briem-RichterAGanschowRSornsakrinMBrinkertFSchirmerJSchaeferHLiver allograft pathology in healthy pediatric liver transplant recipients2013175439VoHDHarpKAMauchTJDiagnostic performance of non-invasive tests for evaluation of hepatic graft fibrosis in pediatric liver transplantation: a scoping review202034100568AzarGBeneckDLaneBMarkowitzJDaumFKahnEAtypical morphologic presentation of biliary atresia and value of serial liver biopsies2002342125SiddiqueIEl-NagaHAMaddaJPMemonAHasanFSampling variability on percutaneous liver biopsy in patients with chronic hepatitis C virus infection20033842732RegevABerhoMJeffersLJMilikowskiCMolinaEGPyrsopoulosNTSampling error and intraobserver variation in liver biopsy in patients with chronic HCV infection20029726148LeungDHHepatic fibrosis scores and serum biomarkers in pediatric hepatology2017912530AlisiAde VitoRMontiLNobiliVLiver fibrosis in paediatric liver diseases20112525968TapperEBCasteraLAfdhalNHFibroScan (vibration-controlled transient elastography): where does it stand in the United States practice2015132736CasteraLFornsXAlbertiANon-invasive evaluation of liver fibrosis using transient elastography20084883547HwangJYYoonHMKimJRLeeJSJungAYKimKMDiagnostic performance of transient elastography for liver fibrosis in children: a systematic review and meta-analysis2018211W25766JainVPoddarUNegiTSSaraswatVAKrishnaniNYachhaSKUtility and accuracy of transient elastography in determining liver fibrosis: a case-control study20201796717MjelleABMulabecirovicAHavreRFRosendahlKJuliussonPBOlafsdottirENormal liver stiffness values in children: a comparison of three different elastography methods20196870612LeeCKPerez-AtaydeARMitchellPDRazaRAfdhalNHJonasMMSerum biomarkers and transient elastography as predictors of advanced liver fibrosis in a United States cohort: the Boston children's hospital experience2013163105864e2FitzpatrickEQuagliaAVimalesvaranSBassoMSDhawanATransient elastography is a useful noninvasive tool for the evaluation of fibrosis in paediatric chronic liver disease201356726Teufel-SchäferUFlechtenmacherCFichtnerAHoffmannGFSchenkJPEngelmannGTransient elastography correlated to four different histological fibrosis scores in children with liver disease2021180223744Behairy BelSSiraMMZalataKRSalama elSEAbd-AllahMATransient elastography compared to liver biopsy and morphometry for predicting fibrosis in pediatric chronic liver disease: Does etiology matter?201622423849HukkinenMLohiJHeikkiläPKivisaariRJahnukainenTJalankoHNoninvasive evaluation of liver fibrosis and portal hypertension after successful portoenterostomy for biliary atresia2019338291ShinNYKimMJLeeMJHanSJKohHNamgungRTransient elastography and sonography for prediction of liver fibrosis in infants with biliary atresia20143385364ShenQLChenYJWangZMZhangTCPangWBShuJAssessment of liver fibrosis by Fibroscan as compared to liver biopsy in biliary atresia20152169316OzturkAGrajoJRDhyaniMAnthonyBWSamirAEPrinciples of ultrasound elastography20184377385JiangTTianGZhaoQKongDChengCZhongLDiagnostic accuracy of 2D-shear wave elastography for liver fibrosis severity: a metaanalysis201611e0157219KimJRSuhCHYoonHMLeeJSChoYAJungAYThe diagnostic performance of shear-wave elastography for liver fibrosis in children and adolescents: a systematic review and diagnostic meta-analysis201828117586DhyaniMGeeMSMisdrajiJIsraelEJShahUSamirAEFeasibility study for assessing liver fibrosis in paediatric and adolescent patients using real-time shear wave elastography20155968794quiz 751GalinaPAlexopoulouEMentessidouAMirilasPZellosALykopoulouLDiagnostic accuracy of two-dimensional shear wave elastography in detecting hepatic fibrosis in children with autoimmune hepatitis, biliary atresia and other chronic liver diseases202151135868ChenHZhouLLiaoBCaoQJiangHZhouWTwodimensional shear wave elastography predicts liver fibrosis in jaundiced infants with suspected biliary atresia: a prospective study20212295969GarcovichMVeraldiSDi StasioEZoccoMAMontiLTomàPLiver stiffness in pediatric patients with fatty liver disease: diagnostic accuracy and reproducibility of shear-wave elastography20172838207TutarOBeşerÖFAdaletliITuncNGulcuDKantarciFShear wave elastography in the evaluation of liver fibrosis in children2014587505AlhashmiGHGuptaATroutATDillmanJRTwo-dimensional ultrasound shear wave elastography for identifying and staging liver fibrosis in pediatric patients with known or suspected liver disease: a clinical effectiveness study202050125562DardanelliEPOrozcoMELostraJLapridaCLulkinSBosalehAPBidimensional shear-wave elastography for assessing liver fibrosis in children: a proposal of reference values that correlate with the histopathological Knodell-Ishak score20205081726BarrRGShear wave liver elastography2018438007AndersenSBEwertsenCCarlsenJFHenriksenBMNielsenMBUltrasound elastography is useful for evaluation of liver fibrosis in children-a systematic review20166338999HanquinetSRougemontALCourvoisierDRubbia-BrandtLMcLinVTempiaMAcoustic radiation force impulse (ARFI) elastography for the noninvasive diagnosis of liver fibrosis in children20134354551ÖzkanMBBilgiciMCErenECaltepeGYilmazGKaraCRole of point shear wave elastography in the determination of the severity of fibrosis in pediatric liver diseases with pathologic correlations201736233744DillmanJRHeiderABilhartzJLSmithEAKeshavarziNRubinJMUltrasound shear wave speed measurements correlate with liver fibrosis in children20154514808BinkovitzLAEl-YoussefMGlaserKJYinMBinkovitzAKEhmanRLPediatric MR elastography of hepatic fibrosis: principles, technique and early clinical experience2012424029HoodeshenasSYinMVenkateshSKMagnetic resonance elastography of liver: current update20182731933TroutATSheridanRMSeraiSDXanthakosSASuWZhangBDiagnostic performance of MR elastography for liver fibrosis in children and young adults with a spectrum of liver diseases201828782432XanthakosSAPodbereskyDJSeraiSDMilesLKingECBalistreriWFUse of magnetic resonance elastography to assess hepatic fibrosis in children with chronic liver disease20141641868SchwimmerJBBehlingCAngelesJEPaizMDurelleJAfricaJMagnetic resonance elastography measured shear stiffness as a biomarker of fibrosis in pediatric nonalcoholic fatty liver disease201766147485SterlingRKLissenEClumeckNSolaRCorreaMCMontanerJDevelopment of a simple noninvasive index to predict significant fibrosis in patients with HIV/HCV coinfection200643131725WaiCTGreensonJKFontanaRJKalbfleischJDMarreroJAConjeevaramHSA simple noninvasive index can predict both significant fibrosis and cirrhosis in patients with chronic hepatitis C20033851826AdinolfiLEGiordanoMGAndreanaATripodiMFUtiliRCesaroGHepatic fibrosis plays a central role in the pathogenesis of thrombocytopenia in patients with chronic viral hepatitis20011135905AsterRHPooling of platelets in the spleen: role in the pathogenesis of "hypersplenic" thrombocytopenia19664564557KamimotoYHoriuchiSTanaseSMorinoYPlasma clearance of intravenously injected aspartate aminotransferase isozymes: evidence for preferential uptake by sinusoidal liver cells1985536775GÛmezPCocaCVargasCAcebilloJMartÌnezANormal referenceintervals for 20 biochemical variables in healthy infants, children, and adolescents19843040712MercedesRBrownJMinardCTsaiCMDevarajSMundenMA liver biopsy validation pilot study of shear wave elastography, APRI, FIB-4, and novel serum biomarkers for liver fibrosis staging in children with chronic viral hepatitis202072333794X20938931ShiauHGuffeyDLoomesKMSeidmanCRagozzinoEMollestonJPBiopsy validated study of biomarkers for liver fibrosis and transplant prediction in inherited cholestasis20204151626AlkhouriNMansoorSGiammariaPLiccardoDLopezRNobiliVThe development of the pediatric NAFLD fibrosis score (PNFS) to predict the presence of advanced fibrosis in children with nonalcoholic fatty liver disease20149e104558MansoorSCollyerEAlkhouriNA comprehensive review of noninvasive liver fibrosis tests in pediatric nonalcoholic Fatty liver disease20151723UmetsuSInuiASogoTKomatsuHFujisawaTUsefulness of serum Wisteria floribunda agglutinin-positive Mac-2 binding protein in children with primary sclerosing cholangitis20184835563YangHRKimHRKimMJKoJSSeoJKNoninvasive parameters and hepatic fibrosis scores in children with nonalcoholic fatty liver disease201218152530MoscaAComparcolaDRomitoIMantovaniANobiliVByrneCDPlasma N-terminal propeptide of type III procollagen accurately predicts liver fibrosis severity in children with non-alcoholic fatty liver disease201939231729HermeziuBMessousDFabreMMunteanuMBaussanCBernardOEvaluation of FibroTest-ActiTest in children with chronic hepatitis C virus infection2010341622El-ShabrawiMHMohsenNASherifMMEl-KaraksyHMAbou-YosefHEl-SayedHMNoninvasive assessment of hepatic fibrosis and necroinflammatory activity in Egyptian children with chronic hepatitis C virus infection using FibroTest and ActiTest20102294651Flores-CalderónJMorán-VillotaSRamón-GarcíaGGonzálezRomanoBBojórquez-Ramos MdelCCerdán-SilvaLNoninvasive markers of liver fibrosis in chronic liver disease in a group of Mexican children. A multicenter study2012113648de LédinghenVLe BailBRebouissouxLFournierCFoucherJMietteVLiver stiffness measurement in children using FibroScan: feasibility study and comparison with Fibrotest, aspartate transaminase to platelets ratio index, and liver biopsy20074544350Pokorska-ŚpiewakMKowalik-MikołajewskaBAniszewskaMPlutaMMarczyńskaMNon-invasive evaluation of the liver disease severity in children with chronic viral hepatitis using FibroTest and ActiTest - comparison with histopathological assessment2017318793NobiliVAlisiAVaniaATiribelliCPietrobattistaABedogniGThe pediatric NAFLD fibrosis index: a predictor of liver fibrosis in children with non-alcoholic fatty liver disease2009721AlkhouriNCarter-KentCLopezRRosenbergWMPinzaniMBedogniGA combination of the pediatric NAFLD fibrosis index and enhanced liver fibrosis test identifies children with fibrosis201191505AlkhouriNSedkiEAlisiALopezRPinzaniMFeldsteinAECombined paediatric NAFLD fibrosis index and transient elastography to predict clinically significant fibrosis in children with fatty liver disease2013337985AlkhouriNPutting it all together: Noninvasive diagnosis of fibrosis in nonalcoholic fatty liver disease in adults and children201791347GressnerAMGaoCFGressnerOANon-invasive biomarkers for monitoring the fibrogenic process in liver: a short survey200915243340EllisELMannDAClinical evidence for the regression of liver fibrosis201256117180RamachandranPPellicoroAVernonMABoulterLAucottRLAliADifferential Ly-6C expression identifies the recruited macrophage phenotype, which orchestrates the regression of murine liver fibrosis2012109E318695KrizhanovskyVYonMDickinsRAHearnSSimonJMiethingCSenescence of activated stellate cells limits liver fibrosis200813465767MehalWZSchuppanDAntifibrotic therapies in the liver20153518498ZhangJLiuQHeJLiYNovel therapeutic targets in liver fibrosis20218766855ModicaSGadaletaRMMoschettaADeciphering the nuclear bile acid receptor FXR paradigm20108e005YounossiZMRatziuVLoombaRRinellaMAnsteeQMGoodmanZObeticholic acid for the treatment of non-alcoholic steatohepatitis: interim analysis from a multicentre, randomised, placebo-controlled phase 3 trial2019394218496HarrisonSAWongVWOkanoueTBzowejNVuppalanchiRYounesZSelonsertib for patients with bridging fibrosis or compensated cirrhosis due to NASH: results from randomized phase III STELLAR trials2020732639LoombaRLawitzEMantryPSJayakumarSCaldwellSHArnoldHThe ASK1 inhibitor selonsertib in patients with nonalcoholic steatohepatitis: a randomized, phase 2 trial20186754959Flores-ContrerasLSandoval-RodríguezASMena-EnriquezMGLucano-LanderosSArellano-OliveraIÁlvarez-ÁlvarezATreatment with pirfenidone for two years decreases fibrosis, cytokine levels and enhances CB2 gene expression in patients with chronic hepatitis C201414131AghajanianHKimuraTRurikJGHancockASLeibowitzMSLiLTargeting cardiac fibrosis with engineered T cells20195734303DehghaniSMGholamiSBahadorANikeghbalianSSalahiHImaniehMHMorbidity and mortality of children with chronic liver diseases who were listed for liver transplantation in Iran200711213KwongAJKimWRLakeJRSmithJMSchladtDPSkeansMAOPTN/SRTR 2019 Annual data report: liver202121 Suppl 2208315ChenIYWhitney-MillerCLLiaoXCongenital hepatic fibrosis and its mimics: a clinicopathologic study of 19 cases at a single institution20211681Kobelska-DubielNKlincewiczBCichyWLiver disease in cystic fibrosis2014913641IorioRGiannattasioACirilloFD' AlessandroLVegnenteALongterm outcome in children with chronic hepatitis B: a 24-year observation period2007459439HaafizABLiver fibrosis in biliary atresia2010433543KendallTJStedmanBHackingNHawMVettukattillJJSalmonAPHepatic fibrosis and cirrhosis in the Fontan circulation: a detailed morphological study2008615048KamathBMYeWGoodrichNPLoomesKMRomeroRHeubiJEOutcomes of childhood cholestasis in alagille syndrome: results of a multicenter observational study2020438798Davit-SpraulAGonzalesEBaussanCJacqueminEProgressive familial intrahepatic cholestasis200941PortaGde CarvalhoESantosJLGamaJBezerraJAAutoimmune hepatitis: predictors of native liver survival in children and adolescents202122995101e3BarrRGShear wave liver elastography2018438007Banc-HusuAMBassLMTransient elastography in pediatric liver disease2021731414TroutATXanthakosSABennettPSDillmanJRLiver shear wave speed and other quantitative ultrasound measures of liver parenchyma: prospective evaluation in healthy children and adults202021455765FerraioliGDe SilvestriALissandrinRMaiocchiLTinelliCFiliceCEvaluation of inter-system variability in liver stiffness measurements2019406475GalinaPAlexopoulouEZellosAGrigorakiVSiahanidouTKelekisNLPerformance of two--dimensional ultrasound shear wave elastography: reference values of normal liver stiffness in children201949918FraserJRGibsonPRMechanisms by which food intake elevates circulating levels of hyaluronan in humans20052584606LebensztejnDMWierzbickaASochaPPronickiMSkibaEWerpachowskaICytokeratin-18 and hyaluronic acid levels predict liver fibrosis in children with non-alcoholic fatty liver disease2011585636LebensztejnDMKaczmarskiMSobaniec-ŁotowskaMBauerMVoelkerMSchuppanDSerum laminin-2 and hyaluronan predict severe liver fibrosis in children with chronic hepatitis B2004398689NobiliVAlisiATorreGDe VitoRPietrobattistaAMorinoGHyaluronic acid predicts hepatic fibrosis in children with nonalcoholic fatty liver disease201015622934HartleyJLBrownRMTybulewiczAHayesPWilsonDCGillettPHyaluronic acid predicts hepatic fibrosis in children with hepatic disease20064321721GelseKPöschlEAignerTCollagens--structure, function, and biosynthesis200355153146MaruyamaKOkazakiITakagiTIshiiHFormation and degradation of basement membrane collagen1991136974JarcuskaPJanickoMVeselínyEJarcuskaPSkladanýLCirculating markers of liver fibrosis progression2010411100917LöhrMHummelFMartusPCidlinskyKKrögerJCHahnEGSerum levels of extracellular matrix in acute pancreatitis199946326370van der VoortEAMWakkeeMVeldt-KokPDarwish MuradSNijstenTEnhanced liver fibrosis test in patients with psoriasis, psoriatic arthritis and rheumatoid arthritis: a cross-sectional comparison with procollagen-3 N-terminal peptide (P3NP)20171761599606WangYPanWZhaoDChenYChenXXiaHDiagnostic value of serum procollagen III N-terminal peptide for liver fibrosis in infantile cholestasis20208131MakKMMeiRBasement membrane type IV collagen and laminin: an overview of their biology and value as fibrosis biomarkers of liver disease2017300137190LeeCGDa SilvaCADela CruzCSAhangariFMaBKangMJRole of chitin and chitinase/chitinase-like proteins in inflammation, tissue remodeling, and injury201173479501KumagaiEManoYYoshioSShojiHSugiyamaMKorenagaMSerum YKL-40 as a marker of liver fibrosis in patients with non-alcoholic fatty liver disease2016635282LebensztejnDMSkibaEWerpachowskaISobaniec-ŁotowskaMEKaczmarskiMSerum level of YKL-40 does not predict advanced liver fibrosis in children with chronic hepatitis B2007521204BaeckCWehrAKarlmarkKRHeymannFVucurMGasslerNPharmacological inhibition of the chemokine CCL2 (MCP-1) diminishes liver macrophage infiltration and steatohepatitis in chronic hepatic injury20126141626ZamaraEGalastriSAleffiSPetraiIAragnoMMastrocolaRPrevention of severe toxic liver injury and oxidative stress in MCP-1-deficient mice2007462308LanTLiCYangGSunYZhuangLOuYSphingosine kinase 1 promotes liver fibrosis by preventing miR-19b-3p-mediated inhibition of CCR2201868107086QueckABodeHUschnerFEBrolMJGrafCSchulzMSystemic MCP-1 levels derive mainly from injured liver and are associated with complications in cirrhosis202011354MühlbauerMBosserhoffAKHartmannAThaslerWEWeissTSHerfarthHA novel MCP-1 gene polymorphism is associated with hepatic MCP-1 expression and severity of HCV-related liver disease2003125108593ChuPGWeissLMKeratin expression in human tissues and neoplasms20024040339MandeliaCCollyerEMansoorSLopezRLappeSNobiliVPlasma cytokeratin-18 level as a novel biomarker for liver fibrosis in children with nonalcoholic fatty liver disease2016631817IkedaHYatomiYYanaseMSatohHNishiharaAKawabataMEffects of lysophosphatidic acid on proliferation of stellate cells and hepatocytes in culture199824843640UdomsinprasertWVejchapipatPKlaikeawNChongsrisawatVPoovorawanYHonsawekSHepatic autotaxin overexpression in infants with biliary atresia20186e5224WatanabeNIkedaHNakamuraKOhkawaRKumeYAokiJBoth plasma lysophosphatidic acid and serum autotaxin levels are increased in chronic hepatitis C20074161623UenoTToyamaCYoneyamaTDeguchiKNomuraMSakaRImpact of serum autotaxin level correlating with histological findings in biliary atresia20215611748BekkiYYoshizumiTShimodaSItohSHarimotoNIkegamiTHepatic stellate cells secreting WFA(+) -M2BP: its role in biological interactions with Kupffer cells201732138793YamasakiKTateyamaMAbiruSKomoriANagaokaSSaekiAElevated serum levels of Wisteria floribunda agglutinin-positive human Mac-2 binding protein predict the development of hepatocellular carcinoma in hepatitis C patients201460156370YamadaNSanadaYTashiroMHirataYOkadaNIharaYSerum Mac-2 binding protein glycosylation isomer predicts grade F4 liver fibrosis in patients with biliary atresia20175224552Figures and Tables
Cell-cell interactions and mediators driving hepatic stellate cell activation and fibrogenesis. Residing in the perisinusoidal space, HSCs become activated in response to a panoply of signals. LSECs, PFs, and HPCs also contribute to ECM deposition. Cytokines such as TGF-b, VEGF, PDGF, CTGF are implicated in promoting collagen production within an autocrine loop. Signals triggering this loop can be gut antigens acting on DAMP receptors on KCs, adipokines, products of cellular injury such as ROS, and some innate and adaptive immune cells. On the other hand, some immune cells participate in inhibition and removal of fibrosis. NK cells resident in the liver are antifibrotic through apoptosis of HSCs. Th1, Treg, and CD8 memory T cells also participate in fibrosis resolution. HSC, hepatic stellate cell; qHSC, quiescent HSC; aHSC, activated HSC; LSEC, liver sinusoidal endothelial cell; PF, portal fibroblast; HPC, hepatic progenitor cell; ECM, excess extracellular matrix; TGF-β, transforming growth factor-β; VEGF, vascular endothelial growth factor; PDGF, platelet-derived growth factor; CTGF, connective TGF; DAMP, damage-associated molecular pattern; KC, Kupffer cell; ROS, reactive oxygen species; NK, natural killer; Th1, T helper 1; Treg, regulatory T; TLR, toll-like receptor; LPS, lipopolysaccharide; ER, endoplasmic reticulum.
Distinct features of pediatric physiology that may contribute to the unique fibrosis pattern and progression seen in children. The process of neonatal or pediatric liver fibrosis differs from that in adults. Neonatal liver clearly lacks the mature architecture and enzyme levels. Similarly, cholangiocytes have immature barrier mechanisms that protect them from bile flow. Interestingly, the neonatal liver has a robust fibrogenic environment despite higher regenerative potential of the skin. The neonatal immune system is immature. CD8 T cells tend to differentiate into effector cells, while the hepatic immune system significantly differs in functionality and composition. The pediatric microbiome shifts across ages and impacts many disorders. CYP450, cytochromes P450; α-SMA, α-smooth muscle actin; Th, T helper; KC, Kupffer cell.
Frequency and characteristics of fibrosis development in chronic pediatric liver diseases
Quick bedside assessmentPediatric probe availableStudied across wide range of liver diseases in children and adults
No real-time USG guidancePoor performance in congestion, obesity, inflammation [167,168]
2-Dimensional-shear wave elastography
Acoustic radiation force impulse creates shear waves
Implemented in US scannerVisualization of liver parenchymaLess limited by movementMeasures multiple levels simultaneously with color-coding of stiffness values
May be affected by steatosis/inflammation [111]Age dependent increase [169]Cutoff values vendor/technique-specific [170]Effect of body mass index unclear [111,171]
Point shear wave elasto-graphy
Acoustic radiation force impulse creates shear waves
Implemented in US scannerVisualization of liver parenchyma
Measures one region of interestMay be affected by steatosis/inflammation [111]Cutoff values vendor/technique-specific [116]
Magnetic resonance (MR) elastography
Acoustic waves delivered by driver placed on patient
MR scanner is the probeAdditional cross-sectional imagingNot limited by anatomic factors
Higher costLonger durationMay be affected by steatosis [120]Breath-holding necessary
USG, ultrasonography; US, ultrasound.
Composite fibrosis scores evaluated in children with liver diseases (see
Supplementary Table for details)
Score
AUC in CLD
AUC in viral
AUC in BA
AUC in NAFLD
AUC in IFALD
Other
APRI
4 Studies
4 Studies
10 Studies
4 Studies
2 Studies
CFLD, ≥F3 = 0.81
≥F3 = 0.66, 0.97
≥F2 = 0.679-0.875
≥F2 = 0.65-0.88
≥F1 = 0.8
≥F3 = 0.79
AGS, ≥F3 = 0.72
F4 = 0.73
F4 = 0.52
≥F3 = 0.64-0.92
≥F2 = 0.7-0.77
F4 = 0.67
PSC, ≥F3 = 0.85
F4 = 0.54-0.86
≥F3 = 0.67
PFIC, ≥F3 = 0.74
FIB-4
-
1 Study
1 Study
4 Studies
-
CFLD, ≥F3 = 0.7
≥F2 = 0.71
≥F3 = 0.43
≥F1 = 0.547
AGS, ≥F3 = 0.68
≥F2 = 0.74-0.81
PSC, ≥F3 = 0.81
≥F3 = 0.64
PFIC, ≥F3 = 0.65
Fibrotest
2 Studies
2 Studies
-
-
-
-
≥F3 = 0.9
≥F2 = 0.62, 0.97
F4 = 0.73
≥F3 = 0.72
F4 = 0.84
AUC, area under the curve; CLD, chronic liver disease; BA, biliary atresia; NAFLD, nonalcoholic liver disease; IFALD, intestinal failure-associated liver disease; APRI, aspartate aminotransferase to platelet ratio index; CFLD, cystic fibrosis-related liver disease; AGS, Alagille syndrome; PSC, primary sclerosing cholangitis; PFIC, progressive familial intrahepatic cholestasis; FIB-4, fibrosis-4.
Most studied serum biomarkers of fibrosis in pediatric hepatology
Biomarker
Structure/function
Expected change in fibrosis
Conditions evaluated
AUC value
Hyaluronic acid
Glycosaminoglycan Cleared by hepatocytes by diffusing through sinusoidal endothelium
Increased in fibrosis due to thickening of sinusoidal endothelium May be increased after foods or drinks [172]
NAFLD, viral hepatitis, CFLD
0.67–0.88 [71,96,97,108,129,173-176]
Type IV collagen
Crucial component of hepatic basement membrane [177,178]
Increases with grade of fibrosis due to turnover [179]
Viral hepatitis, CFLD, BA
0.79 for detecting ≥F3 in BA, not significant for rest [71,108,129,197]
Procollagen III aminopeptide
Type III collagen undergoes N-terminal cleavage at procollagen stage of synthesis [177]
Increases due to turnover May be elevated in chronic inflammatory states [180,181]
BA, non-BA infantile cholestasis, NAFLD
0.843, 0.92No correlation in one study [108,135,182]
Laminin
Noncollagenous glycoprotein found in hepatic BM
Increases due to deposition around perisinusoidal space [183]