Warning: fopen(/home/virtual/pediatrics/journal/upload/ip_log/ip_log_2025-06.txt) [function.fopen]: failed to open stream: Permission denied in /home/virtual/pediatrics/journal/ip_info/view_data.php on line 93

Warning: fwrite(): supplied argument is not a valid stream resource in /home/virtual/pediatrics/journal/ip_info/view_data.php on line 94
Intermittent sigh breaths during high-frequency oscillatory ventilation among newborn infants

Intermittent sigh breaths during high-frequency oscillatory ventilation among newborn infants

Article information

Clin Exp Pediatr. 2025;.cep.2025.00549
Publication date (electronic) : 2025 April 16
doi : https://doi.org/10.3345/cep.2025.00549
Department of Pediatrics, Inha University Hospital, Inha University College of Medicine, Incheon, Korea
Corresponding author: Ga Won Jeon, MD, PhD. Department of Pediatrics, Inha University Hospital, Inha University College of Medicine, 27 Inhang-ro, Jung-gu, Incheon 22332, Korea Email: iamgawon@hanmail.net
Received 2025 March 7; Revised 2025 March 23; Accepted 2025 March 27.

Key message

Intermittent sigh breaths during high-frequency oscillatory ventilation can improve ventilation and oxygenation by enhancing lung recruitment. Although research on this approach in newborn infants is limited, some published studies suggest that sigh breaths are generally applied at a rate of 2–3 breaths/min with an inspiratory time of 0.5–1 second and pressure of current mean airway pressure + 5 cmH2O (maximum, 30 cmH2O).

High-frequency oscillatory ventilation (HFOV) is a lung-protective respiratory support mode that provides effective gas exchange with tidal volumes equal to or less than the anatomical dead space volume, typically with minimal pressure fluctuations [1]. To maintain an appropriate end-expiratory lung volume (EELV) for optimal lung recruitment, continuous distending pressure is adjusted as the mean airway pressure (MAP). HFOV is commonly used in term and preterm infants with respiratory distress. The combined use of HFOV and conventional mandatory inflation was proposed to facilitate lung recruitment [2]. Intermittent sigh breaths delivered during pressure-support ventilation in children improve oxygenation and gas exchange and decrease respiratory drive without major complications [3]. Furthermore, intermittent sigh breaths reportedly are well-tolerated and decrease the mortality rate among adults [4].

Despite many studies examining intermittent sigh breaths during invasive ventilation in children and adults, research is limited on intermittent sigh breaths during HFOV among newborn infants. Although some neonatal intensive care units (NICUs) deliver intermittent sigh breaths during HFOV to encourage lung recruitment, limited research has examined this approach. Table 1 summarizes the studies of and guidelines for delivering sigh breaths during HFOV among newborn infants.

Neonatal high-frequency ventilation with intermittent sigh breaths

Sigh breaths are primarily used to increase MAP and reopen collapsed alveoli to encourage lung recruitment rather than deliver an appropriate tidal volume. They are applied with a relatively prolonged inspiratory time of 0.5–2 seconds and pressure approximately 5 cmH2O higher than the MAP. If no air leak is present, incorporating sigh breaths into the HFOV can help maintain the newborn's lung volume, reduce atelectasis after suctioning, and enhance lung recruitment [5]. In the Kanagawa region of Japan, sustained inflation or sigh breaths are regularly used to encourage lung recruitment among extremely preterm infants with a gestational age of <28 weeks [6]. This approach delivers sigh breaths at a rate of 2–3 breaths/min with an inspiratory time of 0.7–1 second and pressure that is 5 cmH2O higher than the MAP. According to the NICU High Frequency Ventilation Guidelines at the University of North Carolina Medical Center in North Carolina, USA, sigh breaths are used for lung recruitment in patients with atelectasis/underinflation and/or a fraction of inspired oxygen >0.6. They are typically applied at a rate of 4 breaths/min with an inspiratory time of 0.4–0.5 second and pressure that is 6–8 cmH2O higher than the MAP. Once lung recruitment is achieved, sigh breaths are discontinued [7] (Table 1).

According to a study by Hough et al. [8] of intermittent sigh breaths administered during HFOV in preterm infants (n=16; median gestational age, 25.5 weeks; range, 23–31 weeks; median birth weight, 700 g; range, 400–1,600 g), intermittent sigh breaths were applied at a rate of 3 breaths/min with an inspiratory time of 1 second and pressure of 30 cmH2O. Infants who received versus did not receive intermittent sigh breaths during HFOV had increased EELV, increased ventilation in the posterior and left lung segments, and improved oxygen saturation.

Similarly, Baingam et al. [9] applied intermittent sigh breaths during HFOV at a rate of 3 breaths/min with an inspiratory time of 1 second and pressure that was 5 cmH2O higher than the MAP (maximum, 30 cmH2O) in term and preterm infants (n=30; mean gestational age, 33.6±4.1 weeks; mean birth weight, 2,305±853 g). The authors concluded that infants who received intermittent sigh breaths during HFOV had a decreased partial pressure of carbon dioxide (PaCO2) compared to those who did not, particularly those with respiratory distress syndrome. The only published studies on intermittent sigh breaths during HFOV in newborn infants are those by Hough et al. [8] and Baingam et al. [9], with only 2 ongoing clinical trials and little information in the literature (Table 1).

In conclusion, the administration of intermittent sigh breaths during HFOV can reduce PaCO2 levels, increase EELV, and improve ventilation and oxygenation in newborns by enhancing lung recruitment. Sigh breaths during HFOV are applied at a rate of 2–3 breaths/min, inspiratory time of 0.5–1 second, and pressure of current MAP + 5 cmH2O (maximum, 30 cmH2O). Although many NICUs provide intermittent sigh breaths during HFOV, there is little research on this approach and no evidence of its long-term benefit or safety. Thus, further research is required to determine the long-term benefits and safety of intermittent sigh breaths during HVOF and establish optimal settings based on birth weight among term and preterm newborns.

Notes

Conflicts of interest

No potential conflict of interest relevant to this article was reported.

Funding

This study received no specific grant from any funding agency in the public, commercial, or not-for-profit sectors.

References

1. Ackermann BW, Klotz D, Hentschel R, Thome UH, van Kaam AH. High-frequency ventilation in preterm infants and neonates. Pediatr Res 2023;93:1810–8.
2. Keszler M. High-frequency ventilation: evidence-based practice and specific clinical indications. NeoReviews 2006;7:e234–49.
3. Nacoti M, Spagnolli E, Bonanomi E, Barbanti C, Cereda M, Fumagalli R. Sigh improves gas exchange and respiratory mechanics in children undergoing pressure support after major surgery. Minerva Anestesiol 2012;78:920–9.
4. Albert RK, Jurkovich GJ, Connett J, Helgeson ES, Keniston A, Voelker H, et al. Sigh ventilation in patients with trauma: the SiVent randomized clinical trial. JAMA 2023;330:1982–90.
5. Pillow J. High-frequency oscillatory ventilation: theory and practical applications. Lübeck (Germany): Drägerwerk AG & Co; 2016. [cited 2025 Mar 5]. Available from: https://www.draeger.com/Content/Documents/Content/jane-pillowhfov-br-9102693-en.pdf.
6. Sindelar R, Nakanishi H, Stanford AH, Colaizy TT, Klein JM. Respiratory management for extremely premature infants born at 22 to 23 weeks of gestation in proactive centers in Sweden, Japan, and USA. Semin Perinatol 2022;46:151540.
7. UNC Collaborative for Maternal and Infant Health. NICU high frequency ventilation guidelines. Chapel Hill (NC): UNC Collaborative for Maternal and Infant Health; 2023. [updated 2023 Dec; cited 2025 Mar 5]. Available from: https://www.mombaby.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/01/High-Frequency-Ventilation-Guidelines-2023.pdf.
8. Hough JL, Jardine L, Hough MJ, Steele M, Greisen G, Heiring C. Intermittent sigh breaths during high-frequency oscillatory ventilation in preterm infants: a randomised crossover study. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed 2025;110:297–302.
9. Baingam K, Thatrimontrichai A, Praditaukrit M, Maneenil G, Dissaneevate S. Effect of high-frequency oscillatory ventilation with intermittent sigh breaths on carbon dioxide levels in neonates. Clin Exp Pediatr 2025;68:178–84.

Article information Continued

Table 1.

Neonatal high-frequency ventilation with intermittent sigh breaths

Study Participant characteristics Sigh breath settings Findings
Hough et al. [8] 2024 N=16, median (range) GA of 25.5 wk (23–31 wk), BWt of 700 g (400–1,600 g) Rate of 3 breaths/min, Ti of 1 sec, pressure of 30 cmH2O Intermittent sigh breaths during HFOV resulted in an increased EELV (P=0.04), increased ventilation in the posterior and left lung segments, and improved oxygen saturations (3.31±2.10; P<0.01) in preterm infants.
HFOV-sigh followed by HFOV without sigh (HFOV alone), or vice versa.
Baingam et al. [9] 2025 N=30, mean GA of 33.6±4.1 wk, BWt of 2,305±853 g Rate of 3 breaths/min, Ti of 1 sec, pressure of current MAP + 5 cmH2O (maximum 30 cmH2O) Sigh breaths during HFOV reduced PaCO2 levels (45.2±6.6 mmHg vs. 48.8±3.1 mmHg, MD [95% CI], -3.6 [-6.3 to -0.9] mmHg; P=0.01, HFOV-sigh vs. HFOV alone), particularly in those with RDS (MD [95% CI], -4.2 [-8.2 to -0.2] mmHg; P=0.04).
Author and year Sigh breath settings and indications
Sindelar et al. [6] 2022 Sigh breaths are regularly used for infants with a GA of <28 weeks for lung recruitment in the Kanagawa region of Japan
Rate of 2–3 breaths/min, Ti of 0.7–1.0 s, pressure of current MAP + 5 cmH2O
NICU High Frequency Ventilation Guidelines, UNC Medical Center in North Carolina, USA, [7] 2023 Sigh breaths are used for patients with atelectasis/underinflation and/or with FiO2 >0.6. Once the lungs are recruited, eliminate the sigh breath.
Rate of 4 breaths/min, Ti of 0.4–0.5 sec, pressure of current MAP + 6–8 cmH2O
Ackermann et al. [1] 2023 Most modern (hybrid) ventilators deliver CMV and HFV simultaneously, applying intermittent sigh breaths during HFV for lung recruitment.
If sigh breaths are continuously needed to maintain optimal lung volume during HFV, it indicates that the MAP is set lower than what is necessary to maintain lung volume.
Pillow [5] 2016 Sigh breaths are used primarily to increase MAP and reopen collapsed alveoli for lung recruitment, rather than to deliver an appropriate tidal volume.
If there is no air leak, incorporating sigh breaths into HFOV can help maintain lung volume, reduce atelectasis after suctioning, and enhance lung recruitment.
Ti of 0.5–2 sec, pressure of current MAP + 5 cmH2O

GA, gestational age; BWt, birth weight; Ti, inspiratory time; HFOV, high-frequency oscillatory ventilation; EELV, end-expiratory lung volume; MAP, mean airway pressure; MD, mean difference; CI, confidence interval; RDS, respiratory distress syndrome; UNC, University of North Carolina; FiO2, fraction of inspired oxygen; CMV, conventional mechanical ventilation; HFV, high-frequency ventilation