Instructions for peer reviewers
Clinical and Experimental Pediatrics (Clin Exp Pediatr) uses a single-anonymized peer review process. The identities of peer reviewers are kept confidential and are not disclosed to the authors, whereas the identities of authors are known to the reviewers.
All submitted manuscripts are initially assessed by the editorial team for suitability, scope, and editorial priority. Manuscripts considered suitable for external review are assigned to typically two independent peer reviewers with relevant expertise. Depending on the subject matter, methodological requirements, or the nature of the manuscript, additional reviewers, including statistical or methodological reviewers, may be invited when necessary.
The final publication decision is made by the editor based on the reviewers’ comments, the scientific and clinical significance of the manuscript, and the journal's editorial policies.
An initial decision is typically made within two weeks after reviewers agree to review the manuscript. Reviewer comments and recommendations will be communicated to the corresponding author.
Revised manuscripts must be submitted online by the corresponding author. Failure to submit a revised manuscript by the deadline specified in the editorial decision letter will be regarded as withdrawal of the manuscript. Authors requiring additional time or choosing not to submit a revision should notify the Editorial Office.
The Editorial Committee is responsible for decisions regarding revision, acceptance, rejection, and publication. Editorial revisions may include shortening the manuscript, reducing the number of tables or figures, or modifying the format and organization of the manuscript to comply with journal requirements.
The Editor selects the reviewers, and review outcomes are classified as follows:
- • Accepted: The manuscript is accepted for publication and will be forwarded to the publisher.
- • Minor Revision: The authors should address the reviewers’ comments and submit a revised manuscript. The revisions may be reviewed by the original reviewers.
- • Major Revision: Substantial revisions are required. The revised manuscript will be re-evaluated by the reviewers.
- • Rejected: If the manuscript is not suitable for publication, the final decision regarding rejection will be made by the Editorial Committee based on the reviewers’ recommendations.
- • Consultation: Additional review may be conducted through consultation with editorial subcommittees or subspecialty experts when necessary.
About
Browse articles
For contributors