All issues > Volume 48(6); 2005

Original Article

Korean J Pediatr. 2005;48(6):594-598. Published online June 15, 2005.

Comparison of Efficacy of Steroid Oint with Different Potency in Phimosis

In Ok IO Hwang¹, Eun Sil ES Lee¹, Yong Hoon YH Park¹

¹Department of Pediatrics, College of Medicine, Yeungnam University, Daegu, Korea

Correspondence Eun Sil ES Lee ,Email: les205@med.yu.ac.kr

Abstract

Purpose
: Phimosis is the inability to retract the foreskin of the penis over the glans of the penis. Even though phimosis is not pathogenic, the presence of phimosis is known to increase the risk of urinary tract infection in infancy. The use of topical steroids has been advocated as a safe and economical alternative to surgical intervention. The purpose of the study was to assess the effectiveness of topical steroids for the treatment of phimosis in young boys.
Methods
: A total of 53 boys with phimosis were divided into two groups to distinguish between the efficacy of low-potency topical steroid(group 1, 27 cases) and of high-potency topical steroid (group 2, 26 cases).
Results
: The success rate increased in the process of time. After 6 weeks, the success rate was 21 cases in group 1 and 22 cases in group 2. There was no significant differences in treatment outcomes between the two groups. The age of the boys, the appearance of prepuce prior to treatment, and the presence of previous symptoms, including symptoms of UTI, and ballooning of the prepuce at micturation had no significant difference on treatment outcomes.
Conclusion
: Topical steroid was effective in treatment of phimosis in boys younger than 4 years old. Although treatment outcomes between low- and high-potency topical steroids were not significantly different, those treated with a high-potency steroid cream showed more fast improvement. Further studies are necessary to assess systemic side effects of steroid treatment, duration of treatment and prevention of genitourinary tract infection in male infants.

Keywords :Steroid oint , Potency , Phimosis