Clinical and Experimental Pediatrics

Search

Search

Close


Warning: fopen(/home/virtual/pediatrics/journal/upload/ip_log/ip_log_2024-11.txt) [function.fopen]: failed to open stream: Permission denied in /home/virtual/pediatrics/journal/ip_info/view_data.php on line 93

Warning: fwrite(): supplied argument is not a valid stream resource in /home/virtual/pediatrics/journal/ip_info/view_data.php on line 94

All issues > Volume 49(7); 2006

Original Article
Korean J Pediatr. 2006;49(7):732-736. Published online July 15, 2006.
Evaluation of diagnostic methods in children with nonpalpable undescended testis
Noh Sung NS Seok1, Hong Jin HJ Suh1, Dong Hwan DH Lee1
1Department of Urology, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul, Korea
Correspondence Hong Jin HJ Suh ,Email: suhhong@olmh.ac.kr
Abstract
Purpose
: Numerous methods exist for diagnosing nonpalpable testis in treatment of cryptochidism. However, there is no clinically established data for the rational diagnostic tool of nonpalpable testis in terms of expenses. We tried to establish a current conventional diagnostic course of nonpalpable testis. We then evaluated the efficacy of ultrasonography, physical examination under general anesthesia and laparoscopy for diagnosing nonpalpable testis.
Methods
: Between March 2000 and February 2005, 103 boys(129 testes) with undescended testes were treated in our department. There were 31 testes(24.0%) that were not palpable at physical examination. These patients were evaluated with ultrasonography and repeated physical examination under general anesthesia. In the cases where testes could not be detected with ultrasonography and physical examination under general anesthesia, laparoscopy was performed to diagnose nonpalpable testis.
Results
: In 31 cases of nonpalpable testis, 13 testes were detected with ultrasonography and 15 testes became palpable with physical examination under general anesthesia. All of the remaining 16 nonpalpable testes were confirmed with laparoscopy.
Conclusion
: Physical examination under general anesthesia was superior to ultrasonography in making a diagnosis of nonpalpable testis. Ultrasonography and physical examination under general anesthesia could reduce the incidence of diagnostic laparoscopy. Therefore, it is recommended that ultrasonography, physical examination under general anesthesia and laparoscopy must be performed conventionally in order to diagnose nonpalpable testis.

Keywords :Testis , Cryptorchidism , Diagnosis , Physical examination , Ultrasonography

Go to Top