All issues > Volume 54(3); 2011

Review Article

Published online: March 31, 2011

DOI: https://doi.org/10.3345/kjp.2011.54.3.111

The treatment of pediatric chronic myelogenous leukemia in the imatinib era

Jae Wook Lee, M.D., Nack Gyun Chung, M.D.

Department of Pediatrics, The Catholic University of Korea Colledge of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.

Corresponding author: Nack Gyun Chung, M.D. Department of Pediatrics, Seoul Saint Mary's Hospital, The Catholic University of Korea, #505, Seocho-gu, Banpo-dong, Seoul 137-701, Korea. Tel: +82.2-2258-6188, Fax: +82.2-588-3589, cngped@catholic.ac.kr

Received February 16, 2010       Accepted March 07, 2010

Copyright © 2011 by The Korean Pediatric Society

(open-access, http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/):

This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Abstract

Childhood chronic myelogenous leukemia (CML) is a rare hematologic disease, with limited literature on the methods of treatment. Previously, allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) was considered the only curative treatment for this disease. Treatment with imatinib, a selective inhibitor of the BCR-ABL tyrosine kinase (TKI), has resulted in prolonged molecular response with limited drug toxicity. Imatinib is now implemented in the primary treatment regimen for children, but the paucity of evidence on its ability to result in permanent cure and the potential complications that may arise from long-term treatment with TKIs have prevented imatinib from superseding HSCT as the primary means of curative treatment in children. The results of allogeneic HSCT in children with CML are similar to those observed in adults; HSCT-related complications such as transplant-related mortality and graft-versus-host disease remain significant challenges. An overall consensus has been formed with regards to the need for HSCT in patients with imatinib resistance or those with advanced-phase disease. However, issues such as when to undertake HSCT in chronic-phase CML patients or how best to treat patients who have relapsed after HSCT are still controversial. The imatinib era calls for a reevaluation of the role of HSCT in the treatment of CML. Specific guidelines for the treatment of pediatric CML have not yet been formulated, underscoring the importance of prospective studies on issues such as duration of imatinib treatment, optimal timing of HSCT and the type of conditioning utilized, possible treatment pre- and post-HSCT, and the role of second-generation TKIs.

Key words: Chronic myelogenous leukemia, Children, Treatment, Imatinib, Transplantation, Tyrosine kinase inhibitors

Introduction

Introduction

Chronic myelogenous leukemia (CML) is a very rare disease in children, with less than 10% of all CML cases diagnosed in children and adolescents. CML accounts for 3-5% of all childhood leukemias, and has an annual incidence of 1 in 1,000,000¹⁾.

CML is a myeloproliferative disorder defined by the presence of the Philadelphia chromosome, which arises from the reciprocal translocation of genes on chromosomes 9 and 22. It is characterized by the proliferation of a malignant clone containing the Philadelphia chromosome, resulting in bone marrow hyperplasia and peripheral blood leukocytosis and thrombocytosis. The Philadelphia chromosome in CML, t(9;22)(q34;q11), was named in 1960 after the city in which it was first discovered. It consists of a juxtaposition of breakpoint cluster region (BCR) gene on chromosome 22 with Abelson leukemia virus (ABL) gene, resulting in a fused BCR-ABL protein with constitutive tyrosine kinase activity, and subsequent activation of cytoplasmic and nuclear signal transduction pathways including STAT, RAS, JUN, MYC, and phosphatidylinositol-3 kinase. The ultimate result of such activation is the myeloid proliferation and differentiation and suppressed apoptosis that is characteristic of CML⁴⁾.

CML is clinically divided into chronic phase (CP), accelerated phase (AP), and blast phase (BP). Most cases of CML are diagnosed in the CP, but about 10% are diagnosed in the advanced phases. Forty to fifty percent of the patients diagnosed in the CP are asymptomatic. Common symptoms include asthenia, splenic discomfort, weight loss, and bleeding⁵⁾. With progression to advanced phases, other symptoms such as fever, night sweats, abdominal distension, and bone pain may become more evident, together with complications of leukostasis such as neurologic abnormalities, papilledema, retinal hemorrhage, tachypnea, and priapism.

Similar to adults, children progress from the CP to AP, and finally to the BP, but 25% of the patients move directly from the CP to BP. Although the clinical and morphological boundaries of each phase may be blurred, the recognition of disease progression from the CP to either AP or BP is important for both the treatment and overall prognosis of the patient. Table 1 shows the WHO criteria for the classification of AP and BP⁶⁾. The phenotype of BP is 60-80% myeloid and 20-30% lymphoid, with a small proportion showing mixed phenotype.

Diagnosis is made by complete blood count and bone marrow examination, with the identification of the characteristic Philadelphia chromosome by metaphase studies, fluorescent in-situ hybridization (FISH), and reverse-transcriptase polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR). The bone marrow tends to be hypercellular. Approximately 50-70% of the patients have a WBC count above 100,000/mm³ in the peripheral blood, 30-50% have thrombocytosis, and 20% have anemia. The peripheral blood smear shows a broad range of myeloid cells that result from myeloid differentiation, including an increase in basophils and eosinophils. Serologic examination is notable for an increase in uric acid, lactate dehydrogenase, vitamin B12, and vitamin B12-binding protein (transcobalamin 1).

Allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) was previously considered the only curative treatment available. However, perspectives on treatment changed dramatically in 1996 with the development of imatinib mesylate (STI 571, Gleevec), a tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI). Currently, treatment with TKIs, including imatinib, has replaced HSCT as the primary treatment in the adult CML population, and its role is becoming more prominent in childhood CML7-⁹⁾. In this review, we discuss the optimal strategies to cure childhood CML in the era of imatinib treatment.

Non-transplant therapies

Non-transplant therapies

1. The pre-imatinib era

1. The pre-imatinib era

In the 1950s and 1960s, the only medications available were busulfan and hydroxyurea, and the aim was cytoreduction and a decrease in hepatosplenomegaly rather than a durable cure of CML¹⁰⁾. In the mid 1980s, the introduction of interferon-α (IFN-α) as a treatment for CML-CP resulted in 70-80% hematologic remission and 20-30% complete cytogenetic response. The efficacy of this drug led to numerous attempts to lengthen the response rate and duration through combination treatment with IFN-α and hydroxyurea, or IFN-α and low-dose cytarabine11-¹³⁾. Reports of IFN-α treatment for childhood CML are limited, but Millot et al¹⁴⁾ undertook a study of 14 patients, of whom 7 (50%) showed a complete hematologic response and 7 showed a major cytogenetic response, including 2 patients who showed a complete cytogenetic response (CCyR). However, a comparative study of TKI versus IFN-α among adults established the superiority of TKI and its firm role in the primary treatment of CML¹⁵⁾.

2. The imatinib era

2. The imatinib era

The treatment of CML has changed dramatically over the past few years. In the past, HSCT was the only known curative therapy and was the recommended treatment. In recent years, complete responses have been documented with TKIs directed against BCR-ABL, and front-line use of a BCR-ABL targeting TKI is now the standard treatment for most patients with CML. Imatinib, the first TKI to be developed, is a small-molecule inhibitor of various tyrosine kinases, including ABL tyrosine kinase, c-KIT, and plateletderived growth factor. In 1996, Druker et al¹⁶⁾ initially reported on the specific cytotoxic effect of imatinib on proliferating myeloid cell lines specifically harboring BCR-ABL. Subsequent phase I and II trials verified the clinical efficacy of the drug, resulting in approval by the US Food and Drug Administration (US FDA) in 2001. The results of a phase III trial, which enrolled 1,106 patients, underscored the role of imatinib as the initial non-transplant treatment choice for newly diagnosed CML-CP patients; 87% of the patients treated with imatinib showed CCyR at 18 months with 3.3% disease progression, compared to 14.5% CCyR and 8.5% disease progression in patients treated with IFN-α and cytarabine. In addition, imatinib was better tolerated than the combination therapy¹⁷⁾.

The results of clinical trials with imatinib in the adult patient population have been applied to children, and imatinib is now also the front-line treatment for childhood CML. Since the approval by the US FDA in 2003, several reports have been published on the effects and toxicities of imatinib in children. With regard to the dosage of imatinib, pediatric doses of 260 mg/m² and 340 mg/m² have been found to be on par with 400 mg and 600 mg, respectively; therefore, the recommended starting dose in children is 300 mg/m² once daily (maximum absolute dose, 400 mg) and 400-500 mg/m² for advanced-stage disease18, ¹⁹⁾.

The evaluation of the response to TKI treatment is made through hematologic, cytogenetic, and molecular testing (Table 2)9, 20, ²¹⁾. Recently, the European LeukemiaNet has published specific criteria on when and how to make response evaluations⁹⁾. Hematologic response is assessed by complete blood count, whereas differential cytogenetic response (CyR) is assessed by analyzing at least 20 marrow metaphase cells and molecular response (MolR) is measured by checking BCR-ABL transcript levels using RT-PCR. The overall evaluation should lead to a classification of treatment response as optimal, suboptimal, or failure (Table 3)9, ²²⁾. The lack of any specific guidelines for children prompts the consideration of such adult-based criteria to measure response and decide upon clinical status such as imatinib resistance, intolerance, noncompliance, or disease progression. In patients with optimal response to imatinib, the drug may be continued until allogeneic HSCT is undertaken. In those who fail to respond, second-generation TKIs and HSCT need to be considered. In suboptimal responders, imatinib may be continued, possibly at a higher dosage, or second-generation TKIs may be introduced. Currently, clinical trials are under way in order to expedite the introduction of second-generation TKIs to the front-line treatment of childhood CML²³⁾.

Imatinib treatment may result in diverse side effects, but most are of mild to moderate severity, and possibly lesser so for children24-²⁶⁾. Common toxicities include nausea, vomiting, diarrhea, skin rash, edema, elevated liver enzymes, and cytopenia. A common complaint among children is nausea, and food and liquid intake is recommended with drug ingestion in order to minimize gastrointestinal tract toxicity, as food absorption has little effect on drug absorption. Lethargy, weight gain, myalgia, and cramps may also be significant side effects, and bone pain may require analgesics and anti-inflammatory agents. Of special consideration in children is the detrimental effect of imatinib on height growth and bone metabolism, which require long-term assessment of physical parameters as well as serum calcium, phosphorus, parathyroid hormone, and bone metabolic markers. However, little has thus far been reported on the incidence and treatment of complications resulting from prolonged imatinib use in children27-³¹⁾.

Cases precluding treatment with imatinib include drug resistance and intolerance due to hematologic or non-hematologic toxicities. Resistance can be further divided into primary and secondary (relapse) types, which are characterized by lack of response from the start and loss of initial response to treatment, respectively. Mechanisms of resistance are varied and include mutations in the BCR-ABL kinase domain that prevent imatinib binding, BCR-ABL amplification or overexpression, clonal evolution of disease, and decreased drug bioavailability³²⁾.

3. Transplantation

3. Transplantation

Allogeneic HSCT was the only curative option in the pre-imatinib era. However, the good outcomes of imatinib treatment and accurate monitoring of minimal residual disease (MRD) has relegated HSCT to salvage therapy for patients with early signs of disease progression or resistance. For patients without a human leukocyte antigen (HLA)-matched sibling donor (MSD), the search for an unrelated donor should begin at diagnosis, since several months may pass before an appropriate donor is identified. The optimum time for HSCT is during the CP before progression to the AP or BP33-³⁵⁾. Outcomes of HSCT in the BP are poor, with less than 20% long-term survival. Therefore, it is important to undertake treatment with chemotherapy or TKIs to achieve at least hematologic response and to schedule HSCT as soon as possible, with a less than fully matched donor if necessary, in order to improve outcomes. Treatment of the BP that initially may have led to complete molecular response with TKIs can rapidly progress to overt relapse; this emphasizes the need for more frequent monitoring of disease progression in these patients than in those treated at the CP.

Limited comparative studies are available concerning the best conditioning regimen for childhood CML patients³⁶⁾. In theory, reduced intensity conditioning (RIC) should limit toxicity and preserve fertility in these patients. However, patients who received RIC during the advanced phase of disease may show a high rate of relapse, and such patients should be monitored on a short-term basis to predict the need for donor lymphocyte infusions (DLI) or reinitiation of TKI treatment. If allogeneic HSCT were to be reserved for patients who have failed imatinib, then relapse after RIC may prove difficult to manage with TKIs because of resistance. Treatment with early DLI, however, may lead to significant graft-versus-host disease (GvHD) in these patients. Hence, the efficacy of RIC in childhood CML has yet to be proven.

The most difficult scenario is in the case of children who have not responded to imatinib and also lack appropriate donors. Treatment without transplantation would require administration of drugs used in the past such as IFN-α, hydroxyurea, or low-dose cytarabine, but life prolongation would be difficult. These medications, however, may be used to lengthen survival until other experimental, targeted therapeutic measures that are currently being tried on adult patients become available for children. Other options include alternative transplantation measures such as cord blood transplantation and haploidentical transplantation.

Risk of relapse after HSCT in CP is relatively high at 20%, emphasizing the need for MRD monitoring. The effects of TKI treatment for the prevention of relapse after HSCT are still unclear, and require future prospective studies. Methods of treatment after relapse are without consensus, but further remissions may be obtained with DLI and TKI treatment. Imatinib treatment failure before HSCT may require dasatinib for relapse after transplantation.

There is general agreement that for adults, HSCT should be considered after trials of second-line treatment. For children, the most appropriate time for HSCT remains controversial. Whether HSCT should be considered as a first-line treatment when an MSD is not available and what should be the duration of imatinib treatment before HSCT are questions that remain to be answered. Treatment selection may also depend on national resources as well treatment efficacy. Developing countries with limited financial resources may favor one major curative attempt such as HSCT rather than lifelong treatment with an expensive drug. Advanced-phase patients would need to show hematologic or cytogenetic response before undergoing HSCT as first-line treatment³⁷⁾. The question of how long imatinib should be given to CML patients is, as yet, unanswered. Recently, Mahon et al³⁸⁾ showed that 38% of patients maintained complete molecular response after imatinib was stopped for 24 months. Further, patients with molecular relapse responded well to reinitiation of imatinib treatment. The data are promising, because they show the possibility of either intermittent imatinib dosing or complete withdrawal of imatinib, but extrapolation of these findings to children is premature.

Conclusion

Conclusion

Treatment of CML is a model of targeted therapy based on disease pathogenesis and effective monitoring of MRD to improve patient survival. In adults, allogeneic HSCT is no longer considered for patients in the CP, and in children, its role is gradually being replaced by TKI treatment. However, the objective for treatment of childhood CML is not palliation, but cure. Hence, the possible adverse effects that stem from long-term TKI treatment and the potential for disease progression while on TKIs weigh more heavily in the childhood CML population. The development of novel drugs with greater efficacy and less toxicity may allow these patients to be free of the burden of HSCT, with its inherent risk of transplant-related mortality and significant long-term complications. The introduction of new medications into the treatment regimens of children and international studies concerning the efficacy of these medications should take place as soon as possible.

References

1. Altman AJ. Chronic leukemias of childhood. Pediatr Clin North Am 1988;35:765–787.
[Article] [PubMed]

2. Nowell PC, Hungerford DA. A minute chromosome in human chronic granulocytic leukemia. Science 1960;132:1497

3. Rowley JD. A new consistent chromosomal abnormality in chronic myelogenous leukemia. Nature 1973;243:290–293.
[Article] [PubMed]

4. Sawyers CL. Chronic myeloid leukemia. N Engl J Med 1999;340:1330–1340.
[Article] [PubMed]

5. Millot F, Traore P, Guilhot J, Nelken B, Leblanc T, Leverger G, et al. Clinical and biological features at diagnosis in 40 children with chronic myeloid leukemia. Pediatrics 2005;116:140–143.
[Article] [PubMed]

6. Vardiman JW, Melo JV, Baccarani M, Thiele J. In: Swerdlow SH, Campo E, Harris NL, Jaffe ES, Pileri SA, Stein H, Thiele J, Vardiman JW,Chronic myelogenous leukemia, BCR-ABL1 positive. editors. WHO classification of tumours of hematopoietic and lymphoid tissues. 2008Lyon: IARC, :32–37.
[Article]

7. Suttorp M, Yaniv I, Schultz KR. Controversies in the treatment of CML in children and adolescents: TKIs versus BMT? Biol Blood Marrow Transplant 2011;17(1 Suppl): S115–S122.
[Article] [PubMed]

8. Apperley J. CML in pregnancy and childhood. Best Pract Res Clin Haematol 2009;22:455–474.
[Article] [PubMed]

9. Baccarani M, Cortes J, Pane F, Niederwieser D, Saglio G, Apperley J, et al. Chronic myeloid leukemia: an update of concepts and management recommendations of European LeukemiaNet. J Clin Oncol 2009;27:6041–6051.
[Article] [PubMed] [PMC]

10. Hehlmann R, Heimpel H, Hasford J, Kolb HJ, Pralle H, Hossfeld DK, et al. The German CML Study Group. Randomized comparison of busulfan and hydroxyurea in chronic myelogenous leukemia: prolongation of survival by hydroxyurea. Blood 1993;82:398–407.
[Article] [PubMed]

11. Guilhot F, Chastang C, Michallet M, Guerci A, Harousseau JL, Maloisel F, et al. French Chronic Myeloid Leukemia Study Group. Interferon alfa-2b combined with cytarabine versus interferon alone in chronic myelogenous leukemia. N Engl J Med 1997;337:223–229.
[Article] [PubMed]

12. Kantarjian HM, O'Brien S, Smith TL, Rios MB, Cortes J, Beran M, et al. Treatment of Philadelphia chromosome-positive early chronic phase chronic myelogenous leukaemia with daily doses of interferon alpha and low-dose cytarabine. J Clin Oncol 1999;17:284–292.
[Article] [PubMed]

13. Arthur CK, Ma DD. Combined interferon alfa-2a and cytosine arabinoside as first-line treatment for chronic myeloid leukemia. Acta Haematol 1993;89(Suppl 1): 15–21.
[Article] [PubMed]

14. Millot F, Guilhot J, Nelken B, Leblanc T, Leverger G, Bernard F, et al. Results of a phase II trial testing interferon-alpha 2b and cytarabine in children and adolescents with chronic myelogenous leukemia. Pediatr Blood Cancer 2006;47:555–559.
[Article] [PubMed]

15. Druker BJ, Guilhot F, O'Brien SG, Gathmann I, Kantarjian H, Gattermann N, et al. Five-year follow-up of patients receiving imatinib for chronic myeloid leukemia. N Engl J Med 2006;355:2408–2417.
[Article] [PubMed]

16. Druker BJ, Tamura S, Buchdunger E, Ohno S, Segal GM, Fanning S, et al. Effects of a selective inhibitor of the Abl tyrosine kinase on the growth of Bcr-Abl positive cells. Nat Med 1996;2:561–566.
[Article] [PubMed]

17. O'Brien SG, Guilhot F, Larson RA, Gathmann I, Baccarani M, Cervantes F, et al. Imatinib compared with interferon and low-dose cytarabine for newly diagnosed chronic-phase chronic myeloid leukemia. N Engl J Med 2003;348:994–1004.
[Article] [PubMed]

18. Champagne MA, Capdeville R, Krailo M, Qu W, Peng B, Rosamilia M, et al. Imatinib mesylate (STI571) for treatment of children with Philadelphia chromosome-positive leukemia: results from a Children's Oncology Group phase 1 study. Blood 2004;104:2655–2660.
[Article] [PubMed]

19. Suttorp M, Millot F. Treatment of pediatric chronic myeloid leukemia in the year 2010: use of tyrosine kinase inhibitors and stem-cell transplantation. Hematology Am Soc Hematol Educ Program 2010;2010:368–376.
[Article] [PubMed]

20. Faderl S, Talpaz M, Estrov Z, Kantarjian HM. Chronic myelogenous leukemia: biology and therapy. Ann Intern Med 1999;131:207–219.
[Article] [PubMed]

21. NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology (NCCN Guidelines™). Chronic myelogenous leukemia. National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) Accessed February, 2011. Available from: http://www.nccn.org/index.asp.

22. Suttorp M. Innovative approaches of targeted therapy for CML of childhood in combination with paediatric haematopoietic SCT. Bone Marrow Transplant 2008;42(Suppl 2): S40–S46.
[Article] [PubMed]

23. Zwaan CM, Rizzari C, van der Velden VHJ, Beverloo B, den Boer ML, Baruchel A, et al. Dasatinib in children and adolescents with relapsed or refractory leukemia: interim results of the CA180-018 phase I study from the ITCC consortium. Blood 2008;112:3241a
[Article]

24. Millot F, Guilhot J, Nelken B, Leblanc T, De Bont ES, Bekassy AN, et al. Imatinib mesylate is effective in children with chronic myelogenous leukemia in late chronic and advanced phase and in relapse after stem cell transplantation. Leukemia 2006;20:187–192.
[Article] [PubMed]

25. Bond M, Bernstein ML, Pappo A, Schultz KR, Krailo M, Blaney SM, et al. A phase II study of imatinib mesylate in children with refractory or relapsed solid tumors: a Children's Oncology Group study. Pediatr Blood Cancer 2008;50:254–258.
[Article] [PubMed]

26. Mauro MJ, Deininger MW. Management of drug toxicities in chronic myeloid leukaemia. Best Pract Res Clin Haematol 2009;22:409–429.
[Article] [PubMed]

27. Millot F, Baruchel A, Guilhot J, Petit A, Leblanc T, Bertrand Y, et al. Imatinib is efficient but has a negative impact on growth in children with previously untreated chronic myelogenous leukaemia (CML) in early chronic phase (CP): results of the French national phase IV trial. Blood 2009;114:863a
[Article]

28. Berman E, Nicolaides M, Maki RG, Fleisher M, Chanel S, Scheu K, et al. Altered bone and mineral metabolism in patients receiving imatinib mesylate. N Engl J Med 2006;354:2006–2013.
[Article] [PubMed]

29. Kimoto T, Inoue M, Kawa K. Growth deceleration in a girl treated with imatinib. Int J Hematol 2009;89:251–252.
[Article] [PubMed]

30. Vandyke K, Dewar AL, Fitter S, Menicanin D, To LB, Hughes TP, et al. Imatinib mesylate causes growth plate closure in vivo. Leukemia 2009;23:2155–2159.
[Article] [PubMed]

31. Mariani S, Giona F, Basciani S, Brama M, Gnessi L. Low bone density and decreased inhibin-B/FSH ratio in a boy treated with imatinib during puberty. Lancet 2008;372:111–112.
[Article] [PubMed]

32. Shah NP. Loss of response to imatinib: mechanisms and management. Hematology Am Soc Hematol Educ Program 2005;183–187.
[PubMed]

33. Suttorp M, Claviez A, Bader P, Peters C, Gadner H, Ebell W, et al. Allogeneic stem cell transplantation for pediatric and adolescent patients with CML: results from the prospective trial CML-paed I. Klin Padiatr 2009;221:351–357.
[Article] [PubMed]

34. Millot F, Esperou H, Bordigoni P, Dalle JH, Michallet M, Michel G, et al. Allogeneic bone marrow transplantation for chronic myeloid leukemia in childhood: a report from the Société Francaise de Greffe de Moelle et de Thérapie Cellulaire (SFGM-TC). Bone Marrow Transplant 2003;32:993–999.
[Article] [PubMed]

35. Cwynarski K, Roberts IA, Iacobelli S, van Biezen A, Brand R, Devergie A, et al. Stem cell transplantation for chronic myeloid leukemia in children. Blood 2003;102:1224–1231.
[Article] [PubMed]

36. Horn B, Baxter-Lowe LA, Englert L, McMillan A, Quinn M, Desantes K, et al. Reduced intensity conditioning using intravenous busulfan, fludarabine and rabbit ATG for children with nonmalignant disorders and CML. Bone Marrow Transplant 2006;37:263–269.
[Article] [PubMed]

37. Muramatsu H, Kojima S, Yoshimi A, Atsuta Y, Kato K, Nagatoshi Y, et al. Outcome of 125 children with chronic myelogenous leukemia who received transplants from unrelated donors: the Japan Marrow Donor Program. Biol Blood Marrow Transplant 2010;16:231–238.
[Article] [PubMed]

38. Mahon FX, Réa D, Guilhot J, Guilhot F, Huguet F, Nicolini F, et al. Discontinuation of imatinib in patients with chronic myeloid leukaemia who have maintained complete molecular remission for at least 2 years: the prospective, multicentre Stop Imatinib (STIM) trial. Lancet Oncol 2010;11:1029–1035.
[Article] [PubMed]

39. Speck B, Bortin MM, Champlin R, Goldman JM, Herzig RH, McGlave PB, et al. Allogeneic bone-marrow transplantation for chronic myelogenous leukaemia. Lancet 1984;1:665–668.
[PubMed]

Table 1

Definition of Accelerated Phase and Blast Phase Chronic Myeloid Leukemia (by WHO2008 and IBMTR Criteria)^*

^*Adapted from Swerdlow SH, et al⁶⁾. and Speck B, et al³⁹⁾.

Table 2

Criteria for Cytogenetic and Hematologic Remission in Chronic Myelogenous Leukemia^*

^*Adapted from Faderl S, et al²⁰⁾ and Baccarani M, et al⁹⁾.

Table 3

Recommendation for Definitions of Treatment Response to Imatinib Used in Early Chronic Phase^*

Abbreviations: NA, not applicable; CHR, complete hematologic response, CyR; Cytogenetic response, PCyR; partial cytogenetic response, CCyR; complete cytogenetic response, MMolR; major molecular response, Ph+; philadelphia chromosome positive

^†MMolR indicated a ratio of BCR-ABL1 to ABL1 or other housekeeping genes of ≤0.1% on the international scale.

Modified from Suttorp M, et al⁷⁾ and Baccarani M et al.⁹⁾