All issues > Volume 60(3); 2017

Review Article

Published online: March 27, 2017

DOI: https://doi.org/10.3345/kjp.2017.60.3.55

Genetics of hereditary nephrotic syndrome: a clinical review

Tae-Sun Ha, MD

Department of Pediatrics, College of Medicine and Medical Research Institute, Chungbuk National University, Cheongju, Korea.

Corresponding author: Tae-Sun Ha, MD. Department of Pediatrics, Chungbuk National University College of Medicine, 1 Chungdae-ro, Seowon-gu, Cheongju 28644, Korea. Tel: +82-43-269-6374, Fax: +82-43-264-6620, tsha@chungbuk.ac.kr

Received March 12, 2016       Revised May 18, 2016       Accepted May 25, 2016

Copyright © 2017 by The Korean Pediatric Society

(open-access, http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/):

This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Abstract

Advances in podocytology and genetic techniques have expanded our understanding of the pathogenesis of hereditary steroid-resistant nephrotic syndrome (SRNS). In the past 20 years, over 45 genetic mutations have been identified in patients with hereditary SRNS. Genetic mutations on structural and functional molecules in podocytes can lead to serious injury in the podocytes themselves and in adjacent structures, causing sclerotic lesions such as focal segmental glomerulosclerosis or diffuse mesangial sclerosis. This paper provides an update on the current knowledge of podocyte genes involved in the development of hereditary nephrotic syndrome and, thereby, reviews genotype-phenotype correlations to propose an approach for appropriate mutational screening based on clinical aspects.

Key words: Nephrotic syndrome, Genetics, Inheritance

Introduction

Introduction

Nephrotic syndrome (NS) is a common chronic glomerular disease in children and is characterized by significant proteinuria (>40 mg/m²/hr or a spot urinary protein-to-creatinine ratio of more than 2 mg/mg) and consequent hypoalbuminemia (<3.0 g/dL), which in turn causes edema and hyperlipidemia^1,2,3). Although NS is associated with many types of renal disease, the most common form (90%) in children is primary (idiopathic) NS, which develops in the absence of clinical features of nephritis or associated primary extrarenal disease. Occasionally, childhood NS can be associated with systemic inflammatory or autoimmune disease or can develop as a result of ischemic insult, infections, drugs, toxins, or inherited renal diseases^1,2,3).

Most patients (approximately 90%) with idiopathic NS respond to steroid and achieve remission with a good long-term renal prognosis; however, up to 90% of responders will relapse, with approximately half of these patients becoming frequent relapsers or steroid-dependent. The remaining 10%, who continue to have proteinuria after 4 weeks of steroid therapy, are considered to have steroid-resistant nephrotic syndrome (SRNS). The prognosis of patients with SRNS is poor, with 50% developing end-stage renal disease (ESRD) within 15 years^1,2,3,4,5). To our disappointment, steroid therapy is effective in only about 8%–10% of inherited genetic NS, which subsequently shows multidrug-resistance^4,5,6). Therefore, SRNS can ensue owing to genetic, idiopathic, or multifactorial pathogenesis. However, with the increase in the identification of specific defects, cases in the idiopathic group are decreasing.

Pathologically, in most cases (~80%, according to the International Study of Kidney Disease in Children [1967–1974] or ISKDC), patients have minimal change NS, which is characterized by steroid responsiveness. In 5%–10% of NS patients (ISKDC), focal segmental glomerulosclerosis (FSGS) is found. Less frequent histologic lesions include mesangial proliferative glomerulonephritis, membranoproliferative glomerulonephritis, and membranous glomerulopathy^7,8,9). FSGS can be classified as idiopathic, genetic, and secondary caused by injury, medication, or drug abuse based on the underlying causes. Although most histological lesions in genetic NS are unspecific, FSGS is more prevalent than other histologic types^10,11,12,13). Therefore, because the majority of genetic NS is clinically steroid-resistant and FSGS is more pathologically prevalent, genetic NS is difficult to treat, has poor prognosis, and often progresses to ESRD.

Most children with SRNS present with genetic defects in podocytes. Most cases of genetic NS have monogenic causes and present as an isolated glomerular disease or a syndromic disorder with extrarenal manifestations. Molecular genetic research during the past decade has highlighted the central role of podocytes in the pathogenesis of genetic NS. The ongoing discovery of genetic defects in podocyte-related molecules has significantly added to our understanding of pathophysiology and heterogeneity in genetic NS with respect to pathophysiologic mechanisms, clinical onset, diagnostic assessments, therapeutic approaches, and prognostic judgment^13,14,15,16). Although genetic testing together with clinical and biochemical investigations in genetic NS will have significant implications on the comprehensive management of NS, genetic diagnosis is far superior to histopathologic classification in predicting responsiveness to immunosuppressants and clinical outcomes^13,14,15,16). Further research is needed to reveal novel mutations in identified and unknown SRNS podocyte genes. This review focuses on podocyte genes involved in the development of genetic NS and proposes the use of appropriate mutational screenings based on epidemiologic and clinical aspects.

Indications for genetic testing in NS

Indications for genetic testing in NS

Genetic testing should be offered to any patient and his/her family afflicted with hereditary NS to help predict the clinical course, responsiveness to immunosuppressive drugs, rate of progression to ESRD, and risk of posttransplant recurrence; thereby, subsequent management of SRNS can be tailored accordingly¹³⁾.

Although no consensus exists, appropriate genetic testing for SRNS-related mutations can be determined on the basis of current evidence in scenarios with (1) a positive family history of SRNS, (2) congenital or infantile onset (<1 year) of SRNS, (3) SRNS with onset before 25 years of age, (4) lack of response to immunosuppressive drugs, (5) histological findings of idiopathic FSGS or diffuse mesangial sclerosis (DMS) on renal biopsy, (6) presence of extrarenal manifestations (syndromes), (7) reduced renal function or renal failure, and (8) certain ethnic groups^13,17).

Ongoing genotype-phenotype studies of NS patients with several genes and genetic variants have identified correlations with clear clinical significance. When supplemented with hereditary, clinical, laboratory, and/or histologic data obtained, genetic testing results would allow the clinician to refine their diagnostic and therapeutic understanding of an individual case of NS. This could guide a more accurate prognosis or family counseling for a patient or optimize the clinical decision making process in terms of prenatal diagnosis, genotype-phenotype correlations, choice of pharmacotherapy and dosage, or appropriate frequency or type of clinical monitoring, including risk assessment of recurrence after kidney transplantation^18,19).

Genetic methods in hereditary NS

Genetic methods in hereditary NS

Historically, genetic research in NS has studied families with SRNS in order to discover rare mutations in single podocyte genes that lead to this disease^13,14,20). The methodology of genetic testing is changing rapidly. Traditionally, genetic testing in diagnostic laboratories involved the Sanger sequencing of known disease-related genes. However, recent technical advances in high-throughput sequencing allow a high diagnostic yield and a continuous reduction in cost^17,21,22).

Sanger sequencing is a straightforward and highly sensitive tool to test one or few genes per patient; however, in genetically heterogeneous disorders with multiple causal genes, Sanger sequencing of all known and suspected genes is time-consuming and not cost-effective²³⁾. Thereafter, Sanger sequencing for the detection of a single causational gene of SRNS has been replaced by high-throughput sequencing techniques like next-generation sequencing (NGS); however, Sanger sequencing still plays a very important role for the confirmation of genetic variants identified using high-throughput sequencing techniques.

Massive parallel NGS encompasses several high-throughput sequencing approaches and can provide the selective sequencing of a small number of genes, the coding portion of the genome (the exome), or the entire genome. Using NGS technologies, most monogenic SRNS genes can now be determined within days by utilizing a single blood test and at competitive prices compared with traditional Sanger methods. NGS can be used to identify new genes in SRNS or to simultaneously study the mutational spectrum of many genes in SRNS^13,21,22,24). Gene panel analysis performed using NGS currently has higher traction in clinical use compared to whole-exome sequencing (WES) or whole-genome sequencing (WGS), because of its cost-effectiveness. Gene panels are optimized for target sequence coverage and consequently have higher read depth and accuracy compared to the WES or WGS output; however, the number of genes is limited to ~30. Genome-wide association studies (GWAS) typically focus on associations between single-nucleotide polymorphisms and traits such as major diseases. GWAS of cohorts of unrelated, affected subjects with SRNS can uncover disease-associated loci²⁰⁾. These and other approaches including enrichment and DNA pooling can complement rare variant discovery^17,20,21,22).

Glomerular filtration structure

Glomerular filtration structure

NS is a consequence of primary increase in the permselectivity barrier of the glomerular capillary wall, leading to passage of proteins through the defective filtration barrier^1,2,3). Therefore, elucidating the glomerular filtration structure is mandatory for understanding the development of NS.

The glomerulus is a tuft of capillary loops supported by the mesangium, and is enclosed in a pouch-like extension of the renal tubule, known as the Bowman capsule. The glomerulus consists of 4 types of resident cells (mesangial, glomerular endothelial, visceral epithelial [known as the podocyte], and parietal epithelial), and 3 major types of matrices (mesangial, glomerular basement membrane [GBM], and Bowman basement membrane). The renal filtering apparatus of the glomerular capillary tuft consists of three major components: the inner fenestrated endothelial cell layer, the GBM, and the outer podocyte layer^25,26,27).

The highly specialized and terminally differentiated podocytes branch off cytoplasmic processes to cover the outside of the glomerular capillary, with primary major, secondary minor, and tertiary processes—the so-called ‘foot processes’ (FPs)^25,26,27). The podocyte cell body contains a prominent nucleus, a well-developed Golgi system, abundant rough and smooth endoplasmic reticulum, prominent lysosomes, and abundant mitochondria. The high density of organelles in the cell body indicates high levels of anabolic as well as catabolic activities¹⁹⁾. In contrast to the cell body, the cytoplasmic processes contain few organelles. In the cell body and primary processes, microtubules and intermediate filaments such as vimentin and desmin dominate; whereas, microfilaments, in addition to a thin cortex of actin filaments beneath the cell membrane, densely accumulate and form loop-shaped bundles in the FPs^27,28,29).

The FPs of podocytes regularly interdigitate with those from neighboring podocytes, leaving between them meandering filtration slits about 25–40 nm in width, which are bridged by the slit diaphragm (SD). The filtration slits between SDs are critical for the filtering process through the podocyte FPs and retention of protein in the blood stream^26,27,30). The SD comprises nephrin and other related structural proteins that are linked intimately to the actin-based cytoskeleton through adaptor proteins such as CD2-associated protein (CD2AP), zonula occludens-1, β-catenin, Nck, and p130Cas, located at the intracellular SD insertion area near lipid rafts^{26,27,28,29,30,31)}. Signaling pathways from these SD molecules through adaptor proteins regulate podocyte structure, cell adhesion, cell survival/apoptosis, differentiation, and cellular homeostasis^26,28,31).

Recently, the structures of the SD and podocyte molecules have become the mainstay of many studies, and several novel proteins have been found to be important for their function and the development of genetic and nongenetic NS.

Podocyte genes associated with hereditary NS

Podocyte genes associated with hereditary NS

Currently, over 45 recessive or dominant genes have been associated with SRNS/hereditary NS in humans; the known podocyte genes explain not more than 20%–30% of hereditary NS. However, they explain 57%–100% of familial and infant-onset NS, as compared with 10%–20% of sporadic cases^15,24).

Genetic mutations affect proteins that are expressed at a variety of locations within the podocyte, including the cell membrane, nucleus, cytoskeleton, mitochondria, lysosomes, and intracellular cytoplasm (Fig. 1). The podocyte proteins uncovered so far belong to the following categories: (1) located at the SD and connected adaptor proteins, (2) involved in regulation of actin dynamics, which are essential for the maintenance of podocyte structure and function, (3) adhesive proteins at the basal membrane and GBM components, (4) apical membrane proteins related to cell polarity, (5) nuclear transcription factors, (6) proteins belonging to intracellular organelles such as mitochondria and lysosomes, which are central players in podocyte metabolism, and (7) other intracellular proteins (Table 1)^{32,33,34,35,36)}.

Genotype-phenotype correlations in monogenic SRNS

Genotype-phenotype correlations in monogenic SRNS

Advances in podocytology and genetic techniques have expanded our understanding of the pathogenesis of hereditary SRNS, and have accelerated elucidation of the mechanism of normal and pathologic glomerular filtration through podocytes. Further, knowledge on genetic and nongenetic podocytopathies add to the genetic and phenotypic data. Genotype-phenotype correlations in hereditary NS have been explained well, and will be reviewed here.

1. Recessive versus dominant inheritance

1. Recessive versus dominant inheritance

There is significant phenotypic variability associated with defects in NS-related genes. Recessive mutations in NPHS1, NPHS2, LAMB2, and PLCE1 cause severe clinical features of early-onset NS and progress to ESRD, either during infancy or throughout childhood. Recessive mutations in CD2AP and MYO1E cause severe childhood-onset NS and progress to ESRD later. Hereditary, autosomal-dominant NS is rare, occurring mostly in juvenile and adult familial cases. Dominant mutations in ACTN4, TRPC6, and INF2 are associated with late-onset proteinuria and progress to ESRD during the third and fourth decades of life^13,14,17,37). Inheritance patterns for recently reported genetic mutants responsible for hereditary NS are listed in Table 1.

For recessive mutations, family history is unlikely, because parents of individuals harboring such mutations will be healthy heterozygous carriers, and no one in the ancestry will have had disease (because if there is any inherited mutation, it will be heterozygous). For dominant mutations, one of the parents of the affected individual will most likely be affected, and the disease may have been handed down through multiple generations (except for situations of de novo mutations or incomplete penetrance, which can occur in case of autosomal-dominant genes). Thereby, the detection of dominant mutations has important clinical implications in situations of living-related donor selection in kidney transplantation¹⁷⁾.

2. Age-at-onset and specific genes

2. Age-at-onset and specific genes

NS that presents at birth or within the first 3 months of life is termed congenital nephrotic syndrome (CNS), while the term infantile nephrotic syndrome (INS) is used for NS presenting between 3 and 12 months of age. Later-onset NS includes early/late childhood (1–5 years/thereafter) and adult-onset NS.

CNS is usually caused by a defect in a major podocyte SD gene, nephrin (NPHS1), associated with Finnish type nephropathy. In non-Finnish populations, CNS is actually a clinically and genetically heterogeneous group of disorders caused by mutations in WT1, PLCE1, LAMB2, or NPHS2. Therefore, early-onset NS (CNS and INS) is usually caused by mutations in NPHS1, or less commonly by mutations in WT1, PLCE1, LAMB2, NPHS2I, or LMX1B^{14,32,33,34,37,38,39,40)}. Patients with CNS mostly presented steroid-resistant proteinuria in the first few days of life, and rapidly progressed to ESRD by the age of 2–8 years; NPHS1 mutations were detected in more than half of all cases. However, some NPHS1 mutations are associated with ESRD occurring after the age of 20 years^{38,41,42,43,44)}. As an example, a case series from New Zealand reported that Maori children with CNS have indolent clinical course and prolonged renal survival⁴⁴⁾. Mutations in TRPC6, CD2AP, or MYO1E cause severe childhood-onset NS.

Most cases of adult-onset familial FSGS are inherited as autosomal-dominant disease. The most common causative gene is INF2 (up to 17%); other mutations include those in TRPC6 (up to 12%), ACTN4 (3.5%), PAX2, and SCARB2¹⁵⁾. However, penetrance is often incomplete, with variable expression. Many adult patients with familial FSGS present with nonnephrotic proteinuria.

3. Renal pathology

3. Renal pathology

Podocytopathies include 4 histologic patterns of glomerular injury: (1) minimal change nephropathy (MCN), if the number of podocytes per glomerulus is unchanged; (2) FSGS, if there is podocytopenia with segmental glomerulosclerosis; (3) DMS, where low proliferative index has been described; or (4) collapsing glomerulopathy, if there is marked podocyte proliferation with collapsed capillaries^45,46). For specific genes and specific mutations within the same gene of podocytes, there can be a correlation between genotypes and renal histologic patterns^17,37).

In infants (CNS and INS) DMS was a frequent histologic finding, whereas FSGS was observed in up to 90% of individuals with proteinuria onset at 7 to 25 years⁴⁷⁾. Individuals with CNS and the renal histology of DMS usually have mutations in the following genes: PLCE1, LAMB2, WT1, NPHS1, NPHS2, or GMS1; however, MCN and FSGS are rarely seen in CNS^{17,37,38,46,47)}. Data from human genetics and from mouse models of SRNS/FSGS show that the renal histologic patterns of DMS and FSGS lie at different ends of the spectrum of a shared pathogenesis. This means that “severe” recessive mutations (protein-truncating mutations) in NPHS2 cause a fetal-onset renal “developmental” phenotype of immature glomeruli (i.e., DMS), whereas “mild” mutations (missense mutations) in the same gene, NPHS2, cause the late feature of renal “degenerative” phenotype, FSGS^17,48). Irregular microcystic dilation of the proximal tubules is a characteristic histologic feature in patients with mutations in NPHS1; and this condition may be useful for differentiating patients with NPHS1 mutations from those with NPHS2 mutations; however, this is not observed in all cases³⁸⁾.

Familial FSGS may have clinical characteristics that are similar to sporadic FSGS, but the prognosis is different. Patients with familial FSGS tend to be unresponsive to steroid therapy. Thus, when abundant proteinuria is present, the prognosis of familial FSGS is poor^15,49).

4. Syndromic versus nonsyndromic NS

4. Syndromic versus nonsyndromic NS

Mutations in specific SRNS genes may cause distinct clinical phenotypes in a gene-specific and/or allele-specific manner^17,48). Genes implicated in nonsyndromic podocytopathies are NPHS1, NPHS2, CD2AP, PLCE1, ACTN4, TRPC6, INF2, and others^14,15,17,50). In syndromic forms of FSGS, the extrarenal manifestations are most prominent and often diagnostic. Syndromic forms of SRNS, which are far less frequent, may be a result of mutations in genes encoding transcriptional factors (WT1, LMX1B), GBM components (LAMB2, ITGB4), lysosomal (SCARB2) and mitochondrial (COQ2, PDSS2, MTTL1) proteins, a DNA-nucleosome restructuring mediator (SMARCAL1) or cytoskeletal proteins, including inverted formin 2 (INF2) and nonmuscle myosin IIA (MYH9)^14,15,17,51).

Mutations in the WT1 gene, encoding the Wilms' tumor 1 protein, which typically lead to Denys-Drash syndrome or Frasier syndrome, can also cause isolated SRNS⁵²⁾. In addition, mutations in LAMB2, encoding laminin-β2, are usually implicated in Pierson syndrome associated with neuronal or retinal involvement^53,54). Individuals with LMX1B mutations usually present with Nail-Patella syndrome. However, specific LMX1B mutations have been found in individuals with isolated SRNS⁵⁵⁾. INF2 mutations can either lead to isolated NS or be present in individuals with Charcot-Marie-Tooth disease⁵⁶⁾. MYH9, a podocyte-expressed gene encoding non-muscle myosin IIA, has been identified as the disease-causing gene in the rare giant-platelet disorders, including May-Hegglin anomaly, Epstein-Fechtner, or Sebastian syndrome⁵⁷⁾. Genetic causes of most syndromic NS are summarized in Table 2.

Conclusions

Conclusions

According to genotype-phenotype correlations in hereditary NS, an appropriate genetic approach for patients with hereditary NS could be determined based on inheritance, age at onset, renal histology, and presence of extrarenal malformations.

Acknowledgments

This review was supported by the Clinical Research Fund of Chungbuk National University Hospital and Basic Science Research Program through the National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) funded by the Ministry of Education (NRF-2013R1A1A4A03006207).

Notes

Conflict of interest: No potential conflict of interest relevant to this article was reported.

References

1. Eddy AA, Symons JM. Nephrotic syndrome in childhood. Lancet 2003;362:629–639.
[Article] [PubMed]

2. Wiggins RC. The spectrum of podocytopathies: a unifying view of glomerular diseases. Kidney Int 2007;71:1205–1214.
[Article] [PubMed]

3. Sinha A, Bagga A. Nephrotic syndrome. Indian J Pediatr 2012;79:1045–1055.
[Article] [PubMed]

4. Kim JS, Bellew CA, Silverstein DM, Aviles DH, Boineau FG, Vehaskari VM. High incidence of initial and late steroid resistance in childhood nephrotic syndrome. Kidney Int 2005;68:1275–1281.
[Article] [PubMed]

5. Mekahli D, Liutkus A, Ranchin B, Yu A, Bessenay L, Girardin E, et al. Long-term outcome of idiopathic steroid-resistant nephrotic syndrome: a multicenter study. Pediatr Nephrol 2009;24:1525–1532.
[Article] [PubMed]

6. Büscher AK, Kranz B, Büscher R, Hildebrandt F, Dworniczak B, Pennekamp P, et al. Immunosuppression and renal outcome in congenital and pediatric steroid-resistant nephrotic syndrome. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol 2010;5:2075–2084.
[Article] [PubMed] [PMC]

7. McTaggart SJ. Childhood urinary conditions. Aust Fam Physician 2005;34:937–941.
[PubMed]

8. Srivastava T, Simon SD, Alon US. High incidence of focal segmental glomerulosclerosis in nephrotic syndrome of childhood. Pediatr Nephrol 1999;13:13–18.
[Article] [PubMed]

9. D'Agati VD. The spectrum of focal segmental glomerulosclerosis: new insights. Curr Opin Nephrol Hypertens 2008;17:271–281.
[Article] [PubMed]

10. Woroniecki RP, Kopp JB. Genetics of focal segmental glomerulosclerosis. Pediatr Nephrol 2007;22:638–644.
[Article] [PubMed] [PMC]

11. Hildebrandt F. Genetic kidney diseases. Lancet 2010;375:1287–1295.
[Article] [PubMed] [PMC]

12. Caridi G, Trivelli A, Sanna-Cherchi S, Perfumo F, Ghiggeri GM. Familial forms of nephrotic syndrome. Pediatr Nephrol 2010;25:241–252.
[Article] [PubMed] [PMC]

13. Joshi S, Andersen R, Jespersen B, Rittig S. Genetics of steroid-resistant nephrotic syndrome: a review of mutation spectrum and suggested approach for genetic testing. Acta Paediatr 2013;102:844–856.
[Article] [PubMed]

14. Benoit G, Machuca E, Antignac C. Hereditary nephrotic syndrome: a systematic approach for genetic testing and a review of associated podocyte gene mutations. Pediatr Nephrol 2010;25:1621–1632.
[Article] [PubMed] [PMC]

15. Rood IM, Deegens JK, Wetzels JF. Genetic causes of focal segmental glomerulosclerosis: implications for clinical practice. Nephrol Dial Transplant 2012;27:882–890.
[Article] [PubMed]

16. Gbadegesin RA, Winn MP, Smoyer WE. Genetic testing in nephrotic syndrome-challenges and opportunities. Nat Rev Nephrol 2013;9:179–184.
[Article] [PubMed] [PMC]

17. Lovric S, Ashraf S, Tan W, Hildebrandt F. Genetic testing in steroid-resistant nephrotic syndrome: when and how? Nephrol Dial Transplant 2016;31:1802–1813.
[Article] [PubMed]

18. Schrodi SJ, Mukherjee S, Shan Y, Tromp G, Sninsky JJ, Callear AP, et al. Genetic-based prediction of disease traits: prediction is very difficult, especially about the future. Front Genet 2014;5:162
[PubMed] [PMC]

19. Sampson MG, Pollak MR. Opportunities and challenges of genotyping patients with nephrotic syndrome in the genomic era. Semin Nephrol 2015;35:212–221.
[Article] [PubMed] [PMC]

20. Sampson MG, Hodgin JB, Kretzler M. Defining nephrotic syndrome from an integrative genomics perspective. Pediatr Nephrol 2015;30:51–63.
[Article] [PubMed]

21. Renkema KY, Stokman MF, Giles RH, Knoers NV. Next-generation sequencing for research and diagnostics in kidney disease. Nat Rev Nephrol 2014;10:433–444.
[Article] [PubMed]

22. Brown EJ, Pollak MR, Barua M. Genetic testing for nephrotic syndrome and FSGS in the era of next-generation sequencing. Kidney Int 2014;85:1030–1038.
[Article] [PubMed] [PMC]

23. Neveling K, Feenstra I, Gilissen C, Hoefsloot LH, Kamsteeg EJ, Mensenkamp AR, et al. A post-hoc comparison of the utility of sanger sequencing and exome sequencing for the diagnosis of heterogeneous diseases. Hum Mutat 2013;34:1721–1726.
[Article] [PubMed]

24. McCarthy HJ, Bierzynska A, Wherlock M, Ognjanovic M, Kerecuk L, Hegde S, et al. Simultaneous sequencing of 24 genes associated with steroid-resistant nephrotic syndrome. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol 2013;8:637–648.
[Article] [PubMed] [PMC]

25. Mundel P, Shankland SJ. Podocyte biology and response to injury. J Am Soc Nephrol 2002;13:3005–3015.
[Article] [PubMed]

26. Patrakka J, Tryggvason K. Molecular make-up of the glomerular filtration barrier. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 2010;396:164–169.
[Article] [PubMed]

27. Pavenstädt H, Kriz W, Kretzler M. Cell biology of the glomerular podocyte. Physiol Rev 2003;83:253–307.
[Article] [PubMed]

28. Faul C, Asanuma K, Yanagida-Asanuma E, Kim K, Mundel P. Actin up: regulation of podocyte structure and function by components of the actin cytoskeleton. Trends Cell Biol 2007;17:428–437.
[Article] [PubMed]

29. Welsh GI, Saleem MA. The podocyte cytoskeleton: key to a functioning glomerulus in health and disease. Nat Rev Nephrol 2011;8:14–21.
[Article] [PubMed]

30. Reiser J, Kriz W, Kretzler M, Mundel P. The glomerular slit diaphragm is a modified adherens junction. J Am Soc Nephrol 2000;11:1–8.
[Article] [PubMed]

31. Ha TS. Roles of adaptor proteins in podocyte biology. World J Nephrol 2013;2:1–10.
[Article] [PubMed] [PMC]

32. Machuca E, Benoit G, Antignac C. Genetics of nephrotic syndrome: connecting molecular genetics to podocyte physiology. Hum Mol Genet 2009;18(R2): R185–R194.
[Article] [PubMed]

33. McCarthy HJ, Saleem MA. Genetics in clinical practice: nephrotic and proteinuric syndromes. Nephron Exp Nephrol 2011;118:e1–e8.
[Article] [PubMed]

34. Akchurin O, Reidy KJ. Genetic causes of proteinuria and nephrotic syndrome: impact on podocyte pathobiology. Pediatr Nephrol 2015;30:221–233.
[Article] [PubMed]

35. Chen YM, Liapis H. Focal segmental glomerulosclerosis: molecular genetics and targeted therapies. BMC Nephrol 2015;16:101
[Article] [PubMed] [PMC]

36. Bierzynska A, Soderquest K, Koziell A. Genes and podocytes - new insights into mechanisms of podocytopathy. Front Endocrinol (Lausanne) 2015;5:226
[PubMed] [PMC]

37. Kari JA, Montini G, Bockenhauer D, Brennan E, Rees L, Trompeter RS, et al. Clinico-pathological correlations of congenital and infantile nephrotic syndrome over twenty years. Pediatr Nephrol 2014;29:2173–2180.
[Article] [PubMed] [PMC]

38. Machuca E, Benoit G, Nevo F, Tête MJ, Gribouval O, Pawtowski A, et al. Genotype-phenotype correlations in non-Finnish congenital nephrotic syndrome. J Am Soc Nephrol 2010;21:1209–1217.
[Article] [PubMed] [PMC]

39. Hinkes BG, Mucha B, Vlangos CN, Gbadegesin R, Liu J, Hasselbacher K, et al. Nephrotic syndrome in the first year of life: two thirds of cases are caused by mutations in 4 genes (NPHS1, NPHS2, WT1, and LAMB2). Pediatrics 2007;119:e907–e919.
[Article] [PubMed]

40. Heeringa SF, Vlangos CN, Chernin G, Hinkes B, Gbadegesin R, Liu J, et al. Thirteen novel NPHS1 mutations in a large cohort of children with congenital nephrotic syndrome. Nephrol Dial Transplant 2008;23:3527–3533.
[Article] [PubMed] [PMC]

41. Patrakka J, Kestilä M, Wartiovaara J, Ruotsalainen V, Tissari P, Lenkkeri U, et al. Congenital nephrotic syndrome (NPHS1): features resulting from different mutations in Finnish patients. Kidney Int 2000;58:972–980.
[Article] [PubMed]

42. Koziell A, Grech V, Hussain S, Lee G, Lenkkeri U, Tryggvason K, et al. Genotype/phenotype correlations of NPHS1 and NPHS2 mutations in nephrotic syndrome advocate a functional inter-relationship in glomerular filtration. Hum Mol Genet 2002;11:379–388.
[Article] [PubMed]

43. Schultheiss M, Ruf RG, Mucha BE, Wiggins R, Fuchshuber A, Lichtenberger A, et al. No evidence for genotype/phenotype correlation in NPHS1 and NPHS2 mutations. Pediatr Nephrol 2004;19:1340–1348.
[Article] [PubMed]

44. Wong W, Morris MC, Kara T. Congenital nephrotic syndrome with prolonged renal survival without renal replacement therapy. Pediatr Nephrol 2013;28:2313–2321.
[Article] [PubMed]

45. Barisoni L, Schnaper HW, Kopp JB. A proposed taxonomy for the podocytopathies: a reassessment of the primary nephrotic diseases. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol 2007;2:529–542.
[Article] [PubMed]

46. Barisoni L, Schnaper HW, Kopp JB. Advances in the biology and genetics of the podocytopathies: implications for diagnosis and therapy. Arch Pathol Lab Med 2009;133:201–216.
[Article] [PubMed] [PMC]

47. Sadowski CE, Lovric S, Ashraf S, Pabst WL, Gee HY, Kohl S, et al. A single-gene cause in 29.5% of cases of steroid-resistant nephrotic syndrome. J Am Soc Nephrol 2015;26:1279–1289.
[Article] [PubMed]

48. Hildebrandt F, Heeringa SF. Specific podocin mutations determine age of onset of nephrotic syndrome all the way into adult life. Kidney Int 2009;75:669–671.
[Article] [PubMed]

49. Conlon PJ, Butterly D, Albers F, Rodby R, Gunnells JC, Howell DN. Clinical and pathologic features of familial focal segmental glomerulosclerosis. Am J Kidney Dis 1995;26:34–40.
[Article] [PubMed]

50. Singh L, Singh G, Dinda AK. Understanding podocytopathy and its relevance to clinical nephrology. Indian J Nephrol 2015;25:1–7.
[Article] [PubMed] [PMC]

51. Zenker M, Machuca E, Antignac C. Genetics of nephrotic syndrome: new insights into molecules acting at the glomerular filtration barrier. J Mol Med (Berl) 2009;87:849–857.
[Article] [PubMed]

52. Chernin G, Vega-Warner V, Schoeb DS, Heeringa SF, Ovunc B, Saisawat P, et al. Genotype/phenotype correlation in nephrotic syndrome caused by WT1 mutations. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol 2010;5:1655–1662.
[Article] [PubMed] [PMC]

53. Zenker M, Aigner T, Wendler O, Tralau T, Müntefering H, Fenski R, et al. Human laminin beta2 deficiency causes congenital nephrosis with mesangial sclerosis and distinct eye abnormalities. Hum Mol Genet 2004;13:2625–2632.
[Article] [PubMed]

54. Hasselbacher K, Wiggins RC, Matejas V, Hinkes BG, Mucha B, Hoskins BE, et al. Recessive missense mutations in LAMB2 expand the clinical spectrum of LAMB2-associated disorders. Kidney Int 2006;70:1008–1012.
[Article] [PubMed]

55. Boyer O, Woerner S, Yang F, Oakeley EJ, Linghu B, Gribouval O, et al. LMX1B mutations cause hereditary FSGS without extrarenal involvement. J Am Soc Nephrol 2013;24:1216–1222.
[Article] [PubMed] [PMC]

56. Boyer O, Nevo F, Plaisier E, Funalot B, Gribouval O, Benoit G, et al. INF2 mutations in Charcot-Marie-Tooth disease with glomerulopathy. N Engl J Med 2011;365:2377–2388.
[Article] [PubMed]

57. Seri M, Cusano R, Gangarossa S, Caridi G, Bordo D, Lo Nigro C, et al. Mutations in MYH9 result in the May-Hegglin anomaly, and Fechtner and Sebastian syndromes. The May-Heggllin/Fechtner Syndrome Consortium. Nat Genet 2000;26:103–105.
[Article] [PubMed]

Fig. 1

Schematic view of podocyte gene mutations associated with nephrotic syndrome indicated in Table 1.

Table 1

Genetic causes of nephrotic syndrome categorized according to the location of mutated proteins in podocytes

Gene	Protein	Inheritance	Locus	Phenotypes
Slit diaphragm and adaptor proteins
NPHS1	nephrin	AR	19q13.1	CNS, SRNS (NPHS1)
NPHS2	podocin	AR	1q25–q31	CNS, SRNS (NPHS2)
PLCE1	phospholipase C, ε1	AR	10q23	DMS, SRNS (NPHS3)
CD2AP	CD2-associated protein	AD/AR	6p12.3	SRNS (FSGS3)
FAT1	FAT1	AR	4q35.2	NS, Ciliopathy
Cytoskeleton components
ACTN4	α-actinin-4	AD	19q13	Late onset SRNS (FSGS1)
INF2	inverted formin-2	AD		SRNS (FSGS5), Charcot-Marie-Tooth disease with glomerulopathy
MYH9	myosin, heavy chain 9	AD	22q12.3-13.1	Macrothrombocytopenia with sensorineural deafness, Epstein syndrome, Sebastian syndrome, Fechtner syndrome
MYO1E	myosin IE	AR	15q22.2	Childhood-onset SRNS (FSGS6)
ARHGDIA	rho GDP-dissociation inhibitor (GDI) a1	AR	17q25.3	Childhood-onset SRNS (NPHS8), seizures, cortical blindness
ARHGAP24	Arhgap24 (RhoGAP)	AD	4q22.1	Adolescent-onset FSGS
ANLN	Anillin	AD	7p14.2	(FSGS8)
GBM and basal membrane proteins and related components
LAMB2	laminin subunit β2	AR	3p21	Pierson syndrome DMS, FSGS (NPHS5)
ITGB4	Integrin-β4	AR	17q25.1	Epidermolysis bullosa, Anecdotic cases presenting with NS and FSGS
ITGA3	Integrin-β3	AR		Epidermolysis bullosa, Interstitial lung disease, SRNS/FSGS
CD151	Tetraspanin	AR	11p15.5	Epidermolysis bullosa, Sensorineural deafness, ESRD
EXT1	glycosyltransferase	AR	8q24.11	SRNS
COL4A3,4	collagen (IV) α3/α4	AD/AR	2q36–q37	Alport syndrome, FSGS
COL4A5	collagen (IV) α5	XD	Xq22.3	Alport syndrome, FSGS
Apical membrane proteins
TRPC6	transient receptor potential channel 6	AD	11q21–q22	SRNS (FSGS2)
EMP2	Epithelial membrane protein 2	AD	16p13.2	Childhood SRNS/SSNS (MCD) (NPHS10)
Nuclear proteins
WT1	Wilms’ tumor protein	AD/AR	11p13	SRNS (NPHS4), Denys-Drash syndrome, Frasier syndrome, WAGR syndrome
LMX1B	LIM homeobox transcription factor 1-β	AD	9q34.1	Nail-patella syndrome, NS
SMARCAL1	HepA-related protein	AR	2q35	Schimke immuno-osseous dysplasia
PAX2	Paired box gene 2	AD	10q24.3-q25.1	Adult-onset FSGS (FSGS7), Renal coloboma syndrome
MAFB	A transcription factor	AD	20q11.2-q13.1	carpo-tarsal osteolysis progressive ESRD
LMNA	Lamins A and C	XD	1q22	familial partial lipodystrophy, FSGS
NXF5	Nuclear RNA export factor 5	XR	Xq21	SRNS/FSGS cardiac conduction disorder
GATA3	GATA binding protein 3	AD	10p14	HDR syndrome (hypoparathyroidism, sensorineural deafness, renal abnormalities)
NUP93	Nucleoporin 93kD	N/A	16q13	SRNS
NUP107	Nucleoporin 107kD	N/A	12q15	Early childhood-onset SRNS/FSGS
Mitochondrial proteins
COQ2	4-hydroxybenzoate polyprenyltransferase	AR	4q21–q22	Early-onset SRNS, CoQ10 deficiency
COQ6	Ubiquinone biosynthesis monooxygenase COQ6	AR	14q24.3	NS with sensorineural deafness, CoQ10 deficiency
PDSS2	decaprenyl-diphosphate synthase subunit 2	AR	6q21	Leigh syndrome, CoQ10 deficiency, FSGS
MTTL1	Mitochondrially encoded tRNA leucine 1 (UUA/G)	Maternal	mtDNA	Mitochondrial diabetes, deafness with FSGS , MELAS syndrome
ADCK4	aarF domain containing kinase 4	AR	19q13.1	Childhood-onset SRNS (NPHS9), CoQ10 deficiency
Lysosomal proteins
SCARB2	Scavenger receptor class B, member 2 (LIMP II)	AR	4q13–q21	Action myoclonus-renal failure syndrome. lysosomal storage disease
NEU1	Sialidase 1
	N-Acetyl-α-Neuraminidase	AR	6p21.33	Nephrosialidosis, SRNS
Other intracellular proteins
APOL1	apolipoprotein L1	AR	22q12.3	FSGS in African-Americans (FSGS4)
PTPRO	tyrosine phosphatase receptor-type O (GLEPP1)	AR	12p12.3	SRNS (NPHS6)
CRB2	Crumbs homolog 2	AR	9q33.3	Early-onset familial SRNS (FSGS9)
DGKE	diacylglycerol kinase-ε	AR	17q22	Atypical hemolytic uremic syndrome, membranoproliferative lesions (NPHS7)
ZMPSTE24	zinc metallo-proteinase	AR	1q34	mandibuloacral dysplasia, FSGS
PMM2	Phosphomannomutase 2	AR	16p13.2	CDG syndrome, FSGS
ALG1	β1,4 mannosyltransferase	AR	16p13.3	CDG syndrome, congenital NS
CUBN	Cubilin	AR	10p13	Childhood-onset SRNS megaloblastic anemia
TTC21B	IFT139 (a component of intraflagellar transport-A)	AR	2q24.3	Nephronophthisis (NPHP12), FSGS
WDR73	WD repeat domain 73	AR	15q25.2	Galloway-Mowat syndrome, SRNS/FSGS

ACTN4, actinin-alpha 4; ADCK4, AarF domain containing kinase 4; AD, autosomal-dominant; ALG1, asparagine-linked glycosylation protein 1; ANLN, anillin; APOL1 apolipoprotein L1; AR, autosomal-recessive; ARHGAP24, Rho GTPase-activating protein 24; ARHGDIA, Rho GDP dissociation inhibitor (GDI) alpha; CD2AP, CD2-associated protein; CDG syndrome, congenital disorders of glycosylation; CNS, congenital nephrotic syndrome; COQ2, coenzyme Q2 4-hydroxybenzoate polyprenyltransferase; COQ6, coenzyme Q6 monooxygenase; CoQ10, coenzyme Q10; CRB2, Crumbs family member 2; DGKE, diacylglycerol kinase epsilon; DMS, diffuse mesangial sclerosis; EMP2, epithelial membrane protein 2; ESRD, end-stage renal disease; EXT1, exotosin 1; FSGS, focal segmental glomerulosclerosis; GBM, glomerular basement membrane; GLEPP-1, glomerular epithelial cell protein 1; HDR syndrome, hypoparathyroidism, sensorineural deafness, and renal abnormalities; ITGA3, integrin alpha 3; ITGB4, integrin beta 4; INF2, inverted formin, FH2 and WH2 domain containing; LAMB2, laminin beta 2; LIMP2, lysosome membrane protein 2; LMX1B, LIM homeobox transcription factor 1 beta; MAFB, v-maf avian musculoaponeurotic fibrosarcoma oncogene homolog B; MELAS syndrome, mitochondrial encephalomyopathy, lactic acidosis and stroke-like episodes; MTTL1, mitochondrially encoded tRNA leucine 1 (UUA/G); MYH9, myosin heavy chain 9, non-muscle; MYO1E, Homo sapiens myosin IE; N/A, not available; NPHS1, nephrin; NPHS2, podocin; NS, nephrotic syndrome; NUP93, Nucleoporin 93 kD; NUP107, Nucleoporin 107 kD; PDSS2, prenyl (solanesyl) diphosphate synthase, subunit 2; PLCE1, phospholipase C, epsilon 1; PTPRO, protein tyrosine phosphatase receptor type O; SCARB2, scavenger receptor class B, member 2; SMARCAL, SWI/SNF related, matrix associated, actin-dependent regulator of chromatin, subfamily a-like 1; SRNS, steroid-resistant nephrotic syndrome; TRPC6, transient receptor potential cation channel, subfamily C, member 6; TTC21B, Tetratricopeptide repeat domain 21B; WAGR syndrome, Wilms' tumor, aniridia, genitourinary anomalies and mental retardation syndrome; WDR73, WD repeat domain 73; WT1, Wilms' tumor 1.

Table 2

Genetic causes of important syndromic nephrotic syndrome

Gene	Protein	Inheritance	Phenotypes	Renal pathology
WT1	Wilms’ tumor protein	AD	Denys-Drash syndrome	DMS
		AD	Frasier syndrome,	FSGS
		AD	WAGR syndrome
		AR	SRNS (NPHS4)	DMS, FSGS
LAMB2	laminin subunit β2	AR	Pierson syndrome	DMS
			NPHS5	FSGS
LMX1B	LIM homeobox transcription factor 1	AD	Nail-patella syndrome	FSGS
			Microalbuminuria, NS
MYH9	myosin, heavy chain 9	AD	Macrothrombocytopenia with sensorineural deafness	FSGS
			Epstein syndrome
			Sebastian syndrome
			Fechtner syndrome
SCARB2	Scavenger receptor class B, member 2 (LIMP II)	AR	Action myoclonus-renal failure syndrome	FSGS
			lysosomal storage disease	Collapsing glomerulopathy
MTTL1	Mitochondrially encoded tRNA leucine 1 (UUA/G)	Maternal	MELAS syndrome	FSGS
			Mitochondrial diabetes deafness with FSGS
PDSS2	decaprenyl-diphosphate synthase subunit 2	AR	Leigh syndrome	FSGS
			CoQ10 deficiency
			SRNS
WDR73	WD repeat domain 73	AR	Galloway-Mowat syndrome	FSGS or DMS
			SRNS
SMARCAL1	HepA-related protein	AR	Schimke immuno-osseous dysplasia	FSGS
			Early-onset SRNS/ESRD
PAX2	Paired box gene 2	AD	Renal coloboma syndrome	FSGS
			Adult-onset FSGS (FSGS7)

AD, autosomal-dominant; AR, autosomal-recessive; CoQ10, coenzyme Q10; DMS, diffuse mesangial sclerosis; ESRD, end-stage renal disease; FSGS, focal segmental glomerulosclerosis; LAMB2, laminin beta 2; LIMP2, lysosome membrane protein 2; LMX1B, LIM homeobox transcription factor 1 beta; MELAS syndrome, mitochondrial encephalomyopathy, lactic acidosis and stroke-like episodes; MTTL1, mitochondrially encoded tRNA leucine 1 (UUA/G); MYH9, myosin heavy chain 9, non-muscle; MYO1E, Homo sapiens myosin IE; PDSS2 prenyl (solanesyl) diphosphate synthase, subunit 2; SCARB2 scavenger receptor class B, member 2; SMARCAL: SWI/SNF related, matrix associated, actin-dependent regulator of chromatin, subfamily a-like 1; SRNS, steroid-resistant nephrotic syndrome; WAGR syndrome, Wilms' tumor, aniridia, genitourinary anomalies and mental retardation syndrome; WDR73, WD repeat domain 73; WT1, Wilms' tumor 1; AD, autosomal-dominant; AR, autosomal-recessive; NS nephrotic syndrome.