Clinical and Experimental Pediatrics

Search

Search

Close


Warning: fopen(/home/virtual/pediatrics/journal/upload/ip_log/ip_log_2024-11.txt) [function.fopen]: failed to open stream: Permission denied in /home/virtual/pediatrics/journal/ip_info/view_data.php on line 93

Warning: fwrite(): supplied argument is not a valid stream resource in /home/virtual/pediatrics/journal/ip_info/view_data.php on line 94

All issues > Volume 0(0);

Review Article
Need for national guidance regarding proactive care of infants born at 22–23 weeks' gestation
Ga Won Jeon1 
1Department of Pediatrics, Inha University Hospital, Inha University College of Medicine, Incheon, Korea
Correspondence Ga Won Jeon ,Email: iamgawon@hanmail.net
Received: August 26, 2024; Revised: September 8, 2024   Accepted: September 9, 2024.
Abstract
With recent rapid improvements in neonatal intensive care, the limit of viability has shifted downward to 22–23 weeks' gestation. The younger the gestational age of preterm infants, the higher the risk of survival despite severe neurodevelopmental impairments. For infants born at 22–23 weeks' gestation, the limit of viability, neurodevelopmental outcomes, and survival rates may be determined by the quality of proactive care. Owing to the high risk of severe neurodevelopmental impairment in 22–23 weeks' gestation, proactive care is sometimes withheld according to ethical or legal considerations, and there are significant differences in the provision of proactive care and survival rates across countries or institutions. Additionally, there are differing or even lacking guidelines regarding the care of these infants across countries and institutions. Japan and Sweden are countries with well-established national guidance and proactive care for infants born at 22–23 weeks’ gestation, resulting in higher survival rates among them. In Korea, where there is an extreme shortage of neonatologists, maternal transfer before delivery at 22–23 weeks' gestation to high-activity regions with appropriate neonatal intensive care unit resources, such as adequate personnel and facilities similar to the centralized care model seen in Sweden, is crucial for improving the survival rates of infants born at 22–23 weeks' gestation. The survival of these infants largely depends on the quality of proactive care provided. This rate is not static and can be improved through proactive case management based on national guidance and the implementation of enhanced neonatal intensive care practices, including centralization of care.

Keywords :Extremely premature infant, Neonatal intensive care, Survival rate, Resuscitation, Centralized hospital services

Go to Top