All issues > Volume 58(4); 2015

Original Article

Published online: April 22, 2015

DOI: https://doi.org/10.3345/kjp.2015.58.4.142

Neuroprotective effects of mild hypoxia in organotypic hippocampal slice cultures

Seh Hyun Kim, MD, Woo Soon Lee, MD, Na Mi Lee, MD, Soo Ahn Chae, MD, PhD, Sin Weon Yun, MD, PhD

Department of Pediatrics, Chung-Ang University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.

Corresponding author: Soo Ahn Chae, MD, PhD. Department of Pediatrics, Chung-Ang University Hospital, 102 Heukseok-ro, Dongjak-gu, Seoul 156-755, Korea. Tel: +82-2-6299-1479, Fax: +82-2-6264-2167, kidbrain@korea.com

Received July 25, 2014       Revised September 01, 2014       Accepted September 12, 2014

Copyright © 2015 by The Korean Pediatric Society

(open-access, http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/):

This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Abstract

Purpose

Purpose

The aim of this study was to investigate the potential effects of mild hypoxia in the mature and immature brain.

Methods

Methods

We prepared organotypic slice cultures of the hippocampus and used hippocampal tissue cultures at 7 and 14 days in vitro (DIV) to represent the immature and mature brain, respectively. Tissue cultures were exposed to 10% oxygen for 60 minutes. Twenty-four hours after this hypoxic insult, propidium iodide fluorescence images were obtained, and the damaged areas in the cornu ammonis 1 (CA1), CA3, and dentate gyrus (DG) were measured using image analysis.

Results

Results

In the 7-DIV group compared to control tissue, hypoxia-exposed tissue showed decreased damage in two regions (CA1: 5.59%±2.99% vs. 4.80%±1.37%, P=0.900; DG: 33.88%±12.53% vs. 15.98%±2.37%, P=0.166), but this decrease was not statistically significant. In the 14-DIV group, hypoxia-exposed tissue showed decreased damage compared to control tissues; this decrease was not significant in the CA3 (24.51%±6.05% vs. 18.31%±3.28%, P=0.373) or DG (15.72%±3.47% vs. 9.91%±2.11%, P=0.134), but was significant in the CA1 (50.91%±5.90% vs. 32.30%±3.34%, P=0.004).

Conclusion

Conclusion

Although only CA1 tissues cultured for 14 DIV showed significantly less damage after exposure to hypoxia, the other tissues examined in this study showed a tendency towards less damage after hypoxic exposure. Therefore, mild hypoxia might play a protective role in the brain.

Key words: Hippocampus, Hypoxia, Brain

Introduction

Introduction

Estimates for asphyxia-related neonatal deaths vary from 0.7 to 1.2 million annually¹⁾, and peripartum asphyxia is a major cause of disabilities and sensorineural impairments2,3,⁴⁾. Hypoxic-ischemic encephalopathy (HIE) is an important source of permanent damage to central nervous system tissues that may result in neonatal death or manifest later as cerebral palsy or developmental delay⁵⁾. In fact, about 20%-30% of infants with HIE die in the neonatal period, and 33%-50% of survivors are left with permanent neurodevelopmental abnormalities such as cerebral palsy and mental retardation⁵⁾.

There are a number of in vivo and in vitro studies on the protective effects of ischemic preconditioning in which a period of sublethal hypoxia followed by another ischemic event 1 to 2 days later results in protection from an otherwise lethal insult6,7,8,9,10,11,¹²⁾. Gidday et al.¹⁰⁾ first showed that exposure of 8% oxygen to neonatal rat pups for 3 hours had a protective effect on a stroke produced by carotid occlusion and oxygen. According to Khaspekov et al.¹¹⁾, an episode of 60 minutes of oxygen-glucose deprivation (OGD), followed 1 and 2 days later by 90 minutes of OGD, resulted in 40%-60% protection in mixed neuroglial hippocampal cell cultures.

These previous reports have demonstrated that certain percentages of oxygen, exposure times to sublethal hypoxia, and the extent of sublethal hypoxia varies across studies. The hippocampus is comprised of a simple anatomic structure that is easy to manipulate. As a result, organotypic hippocampal slice cultures are commonly used to study neuronal cell death, neuroprotection, and synaptic plasticity¹³⁾. Organotypic slice cultures have several advantages, which include the ability to preserve the gross cytoarchitecture of the hippocampus as well as the possibility of long-term observation and manipulation, which are typical requirements examining physiological or pathological processes¹⁴⁾.

To investigate the effects of and to designate the extent of mild hypoxia, we exposed rat organotypic hippocampal slice cultures in immature and mature brains to 10% O₂ for 60 minutes.

Materials and methods

Materials and methods

1. Organotypic slice culture

1. Organotypic slice culture

Using the Stoppini method¹⁵⁾, organotypic slice cultures of the hippocampus were prepared from a total of 12 Sprague Dawley rats (DooYeol Biotech, Seoul, Korea) aged 7days. Rats were stabilized for 24 hours before the start of the experiment and were decapitated using scissors. Heads were sterilized with 70% alcohol, and the hippocampi were quickly removed and placed in ice-cold Gey's Balanced Salt Solution (GBSS, Sigma Aldrich, St Louis, MO, USA). The hippocampi were sliced (450 µm thick) using a tissue chopper (Stoelting Co., Wood Dale, IL, USA), and Millicell culture inserts (Millipore, Ireland, 6 slices per insert) were placed into 6-well plates (SPL Life Sciences Co., Pocheon, Korea) with 1 mL of Gahwiler's media per well. The slice culture media consisted of 25% Hank's Balanced Salt Solution (GibcoBRL/Life Technologies, Grand Island, NY, USA), 25% heat inactivated horse serum (Hyclone, Logan, UT, USA), 50% basal medium eagle (GibcoBRL/Life Technologies), 6.5-mg/mL glucose, and 200mM glutamax-I (GibcoBRL/Life Technologies). Slices were cultured at 37℃ with 5% CO₂ in a humidified incubator (MCO175, Sanyo, Tokyo, Japan), and the media was changed twice per week. All procedures were performed aseptically in a horizontal flow hood.

2. Hypoxic injury

2. Hypoxic injury

Slices were divided into two groups: 7 days in vitro (DIV) and 14 DIV. Hippocampal tissues at 7 DIV were representative of immature brains, while 14 DIV hippocampal tissues were representative of the mature brains¹⁴⁾. The tissues in each group were exposed to 10% O₂ for 60 minutes; deteriorating tissues were excluded prior to induction of hypoxic injury.

3. Image analysis

3. Image analysis

Fluorescent images of the slices were captured under an inverted microscope (IX 71, Olympus, Tokyo, Japan) 24 hours after hypoxic injury. To introduce total damage, slices were then exposed to 2mM N-methyl-D-aspartate (NMDA) in serum-free medium for 30 minutes at 37℃ with 5% CO₂ in a humidified incubator. Slices were then cultured with 1 mL of serum-free media with 1-µg propidium iodide (Sigma Aldrich), and fluorescent images were obtained 24 hours after total damage. Images were analyzed with Image J (ver. 1.47c, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA), using a defined threshold as the amount of fluorescent area with a single researcher measuring individual areas above the threshold in the cornu ammonis 1 (CA1), CA3, and dentate gyrus (DG) (Fig. 1). After NMDA processing, images were assumed to include the total area of the hippocampal tissue. We then estimated the extent of damage 24 hours after hypoxic injury. Tissues in the 7 DIV and 14 DIV groups were compared, and hypoxia-exposed tissues were compared with the control group (Fig. 2). The ratio of damaged area at 24 hours to the total damaged area after NMDA treatment was also calculated.

4. Statistical analysis

4. Statistical analysis

We evaluated brain injury by comparing tissues at 7 DIV with tissues at 14 DIV using Student t test and Mann-Whitney U test. Differences were considered significant when P<0.05. All analyses were performed using PASW Statistics ver. 18.0 (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA).

Results

Results

1. Cultured hippocampal tissues at 7 DIV

1. Cultured hippocampal tissues at 7 DIV

Damage to CA1 in hippocampal tissue at 7 DIV was 5.59%±2.99% in the control group (mean±standard error, n=30, measured area/total area). In tissues exposed to 10% O₂ for 60 minutes, the damage was 4.80%±1.37%. There were no significant differences between the tissues exposed to 10% O₂ for 60 minutes and the control group (P=0.900).

Damage to CA3 in hippocampal tissue at 7 DIV was 0.04%±0.02% in the control group. In tissues exposed to 10% O₂ for 60 minutes, the damage was 0.35%±0.13%. There were no significant differences between tissues exposed to 10% O₂ for 60 minutes and the control group (P=0.321).

Damage to DG in hippocampal tissue at 7 DIV was 33.88%±12.53% in the control group. In tissues exposed to 10% O₂ for 60 minutes, the damage was 15.98%±2.37%. There were no significant differences between tissues exposed to 10% O2 for 60 minutes and the control group (P=0.166).

In summary, compared to control group, in the 7 DIV group, tissues exposed to 10% O₂ for 60 minutes tended to have decreased damage in the CA1 and DG (CA1: 5.59%±2.99% vs. 4.80%±1.37%, P=0.900, DG: 33.88%±12.53% vs. 15.98%±2.37%, P=0.166), but this decrease was not statistically significant (Fig. 3).

2. Cultured hippocampal tissues at 14 DIV

2. Cultured hippocampal tissues at 14 DIV

Damage to CA1 in hippocampal tissue at 14 DIV was 50.91%±5.90% in the control group (mean±standard error, n=30, measured area/total area). In tissues exposed to 10% O₂ for 60 minutes, the damage was 32.30%±3.34%. The tissues exposed to 10% O2 for 60 minutes showed significantly less damage than control tissues (P=0.004).

Damage to CA3 in hippocampal tissue at 14 DIV was 24.51%±6.05% in the control group. In tissues exposed to 10% O₂ for 60 minutes, the damage was 18.31%±3.28%. There were no significant differences between tissues exposed to 10% O₂ for 60 minutes and the control group (P=0.373).

Damage to DG in hippocampal tissue at 14 DIV was 15.72%± 3.47% in the control group. In tissues exposed to 10% O₂ for 60 minutes, the damage was 9.91%±2.11%. There were no significant differences between tissues exposed to 10% O₂ for 60 minutes and the control group (P=0.134).

In summary, in the 14 DIV group, compared to the control group, tissues exposed to 10% O₂ for 60 minutes showed decreased damage. This decrease was not significant in the CA3 (24.51%±6.05% vs. 18.31%±3.28%, P=0.373) and, DG (15.72%±3.47% vs. 9.91%±2.11%, P=0.134), but it was significant in the CA1 (50.91%±5.90% vs. 32.30%±3.34%, P=0.004) (Fig. 4).

Discussion

Discussion

Asphyxia at birth is a frequent event that affects 4 million infants per year; moreover, about 1 million infants die from asphyxia while another 1 million experience persistent brain damage each year¹⁶⁾. The causes of neonatal brain damage in response to hypoxic-ischemic insult are multifactorial¹⁷⁾. In the developing brain, lack of oxygen availability results in an initial depletion of high energy phosphates, in particular adenosine triphosphate and phospho-creatine¹⁷⁾.

The brain is particularly vulnerable to hypoxic conditions, such as those encountered in diving, high altitudes, aviation, and ischemia, especially hypoxia-ischemia followed by reperfusion¹⁸⁾. Severe hypoxia-ischemia reperfusion leads to intracellular calcium overload, mitochondrial functional disorders, and structural lesions, resulting in a series of cellular functional impairments¹⁸⁾. Moreover, mitochondrial dysfunction is involved in neuronal damage associated with hypoxic-ischemic reperfusion injury¹⁷⁾. Recent studies strongly suggest the involvement of apoptosis in ischemia-induced delayed neuronal death19,²⁰⁾.

There are several in vivo and in vitro models that demonstrate the neuroprotective properties of sub-lethal hypoxia6,7,8,9,10,11,¹²⁾. Gidday et al.¹⁰⁾ first showed that a 3-hour pre-exposure of 8% oxygen to neonatal rat pups had protective effects over stroke produced by carotid occlusion and oxygen. Gorgias et al.¹²⁾, investigated whether pretreatment with mild (15% O₂) or moderate (10% O₂) hypoxia could protect hippocampal neurons from damage induced by severe (3% O₂) hypoxia. This group found that the moderate hypoxia pretreatment group had the most normal cells after severe hypoxia, as compared to mild hypoxia and control groups¹²⁾. Xu et al.⁶⁾, exposed organotypic hippocampal slice cultures to either OGD for 45 minutes (ischemia) or to OGD for 15 minutes (ischemic preconditioning) 48 hours prior to OGD. OGD was achieved by combining severe hypoxia with aglycemia⁶⁾. Xu et al.⁶⁾ found that there was significant protection by ischemic preconditioning when the delay between insults was 48 hours. Other in vitro models of ischemic preconditioning have provided robust neuroprotection¹¹⁾. For example, according to Khaspekov et al.¹¹⁾, an episode of 60 minutes of OGD, followed 1 and 2 days later by 90 minutes of OGD resulted in 40%-60% protection in mixed neuroglial hippocampal cell cultures. In their studies, OGD was achieved by glucose and argon-mediated oxygen deprivation¹¹⁾. Additionally, an in vitro study by Badaut et al.²¹⁾, showed that when organotypic hippocampal slice cultures were exposed to a combined OGD of varying intensities, ischemic preconditioning was accomplished by exposure to the mildest ischemia condition (10% of O₂ for 15 minutes) 24 hours before the severe deprivation (5% of O₂ for 30 minutes). Moreover ischemic preconditioning not only prevented delayed ischemic cell death 6 days after insult but also the transient loss of evoked potential responses²¹⁾.

The mechanisms of hypoxic and ischemic preconditioning are still debatable; both of these types of preconditioning appear to require RNA and protein synthesis10,22,23,24,25,²⁶⁾. Several molecules induced by hypoxia, such as erythropoietin and vascular endothelial growth factor are known to be protective²⁷⁾. Additionally, hypoxia-inducible factor (HIF) and HIF target genes are known to be related to hypoxia-induced tolerance²⁸⁾.

It has also been shown that mild to moderate hypoxia (>8% oxygen) does not produce neuronal cell death29,³⁰⁾. In order to determine the time of OGD exposure required to induce cell death, it was found that cultures subjected to 60 minutes of OGD did not increase cell death, while 90 minutes of OGD resulted in a significant increase in cell death¹¹⁾. Wise-Faberowski et al.³¹⁾, evaluated the age-dependent effect of OGD in the developing rat brain by preparing organotypic hippocampal slice cultures from rat pups on postnatal days 4, 7, 14, and 21 and cultured at 7 DIV³¹⁾. The slices were exposed to OGD for durations of 5-60 minutes and cell death was evident in organotypic hippocampal slice cultures prepared from post natal days 14 and 21 (P<0.001) with OGD durations of 5 and 10 minutes, respectively. As in these studies, percentage of oxygen, time of exposure for sublethal hypoxia, and the extent of sublethal hypoxia varied.

In our current study, the 60-minute duration of hypoxic exposure with 10% O₂ was selected after reviewing previous articles and considering our experiences with organotypic hippocampal slice cultures. Interestingly, in hippocampal tissue at 14 DIV, the CA1 showed significantly decreased damage after exposure to 10% O₂ for 60 minutes. Although it was not statistically significant, other tissues generally showed a tendency to have less damage after exposure to 10% O₂ for 60 minutes.

These data indicate that the mature brain has a larger neuroprotective response to 10% O₂ for 60 minutes exposure than the immature brain. Many mechanisms and molecules have been known to be associated with various types of preconditioning. These include HIF, lactate, adenosine A1 receptors, nuclear factor κB, adenosine triphosphate-sensitive potassium channel, erythropoietin, vascular endothelial growth factor, and others27,28,32,33,34,³⁵⁾. The result in the current study that the mature brain exhibited a greater neuroprotective response than the immature brain, might be explained by the mechanisms and molecules associated with preconditioning; however, this will need to be explored further by future studies.

In relation to a clinical setting, our results might explain the reason why many neonates with HIE which had undergone similar hypoxic insults during labor result in different clinical outcomes. In other words, neonates most likely experience different levels of hypoxia during pregnancy so each case results in different neuroprotective effects on the brain.

In conclusion, our study suggests that mild hypoxia might have a neuroprotective influence in the brain. One limitation of our study was that we did not perform severe, lethal hypoxia to the mild hypoxia-exposed groups, so it was hard to correlate neuroprotective effects with ischemic preconditioning. Therefore, further studies are needed to determine the most effective protocol of generating a model of hypoxia-induced neuroprotection.

Conflicts of interest

Conflicts of interest: No potential conflict of interest relevant to this article was reported.

References

1. Lawn J, Shibuya K, Stein C. No cry at birth: global estimates of intrapartum stillbirths and intrapartum-related neonatal deaths. Bull World Health Organ 2005;83:409–417.
[PubMed] [PMC]

2. Gonzalez FF, Miller SP. Does perinatal asphyxia impair cognitive function without cerebral palsy? Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed 2006;91:F454–F459.
[Article] [PubMed] [PMC]

3. Marlow N, Rose AS, Rands CE, Draper ES. Neuropsychological and educational problems at school age associated with neonatal encephalopathy. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed 2005;90:F380–F387.
[Article] [PubMed] [PMC]

4. van Handel M, Swaab H, de Vries LS, Jongmans MJ. Long-term cognitive and behavioral consequences of neonatal encephalopathy following perinatal asphyxia: a review. Eur J Pediatr 2007;166:645–654.
[Article] [PubMed] [PMC]

5. In: Kliegman RM, Stanton B, St. Geme JW, Schor NF, Behrman RE, editors. Nelson textbook of pediatrics. 19th ed. Philadelphia: Elsevier Saunders, 2011.

6. Xu GP, Dave KR, Vivero R, Schmidt-Kastner R, Sick TJ, Perez-Pinzon MA. Improvement in neuronal survival after ischemic preconditioning in hippocampal slice cultures. Brain Res 2002;952:153–158.
[Article] [PubMed]

7. Kristensen BW, Noraberg J, Zimmer J. Comparison of excitotoxic profiles of ATPA, AMPA, KA and NMDA in organotypic hippocampal slice cultures. Brain Res 2001;917:21–44.
[Article] [PubMed]

8. Pringle AK, Thomas SJ, Signorelli F, Iannotti F. Ischaemic preconditioning in organotypic hippocampal slice cultures is inversely correlated to the induction of the 72 kDa heat shock protein (HSP72). Brain Res 1999;845:152–164.
[Article] [PubMed]

9. Shamloo M, Rytter A, Wieloch T. Activation of the extracellular signal-regulated protein kinase cascade in the hippocampal CA1 region in a rat model of global cerebral ischemic preconditioning. Neuroscience 1999;93:81–88.
[Article] [PubMed]

10. Gidday JM, Fitzgibbons JC, Shah AR, Park TS. Neuroprotection from ischemic brain injury by hypoxic preconditioning in the neonatal rat. Neurosci Lett 1994;168:221–224.
[Article] [PubMed]

11. Khaspekov L, Shamloo M, Victorov I, Wieloch T. Sublethal in vitro glucose-oxygen deprivation protects cultured hippocampal neurons against a subsequent severe insult. Neuroreport 1998;9:1273–1276.
[Article] [PubMed]

12. Gorgias N, Maidatsi P, Tsolaki M, Alvanou A, Kiriazis G, Kaidoglou K, et al. Hypoxic pretreatment protects against neuronal damage of the rat hippocampus induced by severe hypoxia. Brain Res 1996;714:215–225.
[Article] [PubMed]

13. Holopainen IE. Organotypic hippocampal slice cultures: a model system to study basic cellular and molecular mechanisms of neuronal cell death, neuroprotection, and synaptic plasticity. Neurochem Res 2005;30:1521–1528.
[Article] [PubMed]

14. Youn YC, Kwon OS, Chae SA. The Bcl-2 and NeuN expressions and morphological changes in organotypic explant culture of rat hippocampus. J Korean Neurol Assoc 2004;22:368–374.

15. Stoppini L, Buchs PA, Muller D. A simple method for organotypic cultures of nervous tissue. J Neurosci Methods 1991;37:173–182.
[Article] [PubMed]

16. Tarnow-Mordi WO. Room air or oxygen for asphyxiated babies? Lancet 1998;352:341–342.
[Article] [PubMed]

17. Rousset CI, Baburamani AA, Thornton C, Hagberg H. Mitochondria and perinatal brain injury. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med 2012;25(Suppl 1): 35–38.
[Article]

18. Chen J, Liao W, Gao W, Huang J, Gao Y. Intermittent hypoxia protects cerebral mitochondrial function from calcium overload. Acta Neurol Belg 2013;113:507–513.
[Article] [PubMed]

19. Eldadah BA, Faden AI. Caspase pathways, neuronal apoptosis, and CNS injury. J Neurotrauma 2000;17:811–829.
[Article] [PubMed]

20. Graham SH, Chen J. Programmed cell death in cerebral ischemia. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab 2001;21:99–109.
[Article] [PubMed]

21. Badaut J, Hirt L, Price M, de Castro Ribeiro M, Magistretti PJ, Regli L. Hypoxia/hypoglycemia preconditioning prevents the loss of functional electrical activity in organotypic slice cultures. Brain Res 2005;1051:117–122.
[Article] [PubMed]

22. Barone FC, White RF, Spera PA, Ellison J, Currie RW, Wang X, et al. Ischemic preconditioning and brain tolerance: temporal histological and functional outcomes, protein synthesis requirement, and interleukin-1 receptor antagonist and early gene expression. Stroke 1998;29:1937–1950.
[Article] [PubMed]

23. Currie RW, Ellison JA, White RF, Feuerstein GZ, Wang X, Barone FC. Benign focal ischemic preconditioning induces neuronal Hsp70 and prolonged astrogliosis with expression of Hsp27. Brain Res 2000;863:169–181.
[Article] [PubMed]

24. Gage AT, Stanton PK. Hypoxia triggers neuroprotective alterations in hippocampal gene expression via a heme-containing sensor. Brain Res 1996;719:172–178.
[Article] [PubMed]

25. Emerson MR, Nelson SR, Samson FE, Pazdernik TL. A global hypoxia preconditioning model: neuroprotection against seizure-induced specific gravity changes (edema) and brain damage in rats. Brain Res Brain Res Protoc 1999;4:360–366.
[Article] [PubMed]

26. Wick A, Wick W, Waltenberger J, Weller M, Dichgans J, Schulz JB. Neuroprotection by hypoxic preconditioning requires sequential activation of vascular endothelial growth factor receptor and Akt. J Neurosci 2002;22:6401–6407.
[Article] [PubMed] [PMC]

27. Xi G, Reiser G, Keep RF. The role of thrombin and thrombin receptors in ischemic, hemorrhagic and traumatic brain injury: deleterious or protective? J Neurochem 2003;84:3–9.
[Article] [PubMed]

28. Bergeron M, Gidday JM, Yu AY, Semenza GL, Ferriero DM, Sharp FR. Role of hypoxia-inducible factor-1 in hypoxia-induced ischemic tolerance in neonatal rat brain. Ann Neurol 2000;48:285–296.
[Article] [PubMed]

29. Simon RP. Hypoxia versus ischemia. Neurology 1999;52:7–8.
[Article] [PubMed]

30. Tang Y, Nee AC, Lu A, Ran R, Sharp FR. Blood genomic expression profile for neuronal injury. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab 2003;23:310–319.
[Article] [PubMed]

31. Wise-Faberowski L, Robinson PN, Rich S, Warner DS. Oxygen and glucose deprivation in an organotypic hippocampal slice model of the developing rat brain: the effects on N-methyl-D-aspartate subunit composition. Anesth Analg 2009;109:205–210.
[Article] [PubMed] [PMC]

32. Bergeron M, Yu AY, Solway KE, Semenza GL, Sharp FR. Induction of hypoxia-inducible factor-1 (HIF-1) and its target genes following focal ischaemia in rat brain. Eur J Neurosci 1999;11:4159–4170.
[Article] [PubMed]

33. Schurr A, Payne RS, Tseng MT, Gozal E, Gozal D. Excitotoxic preconditioning elicited by both glutamate and hypoxia and abolished by lactate transport inhibition in rat hippocampal slices. Neurosci Lett 2001;307:151–154.
[Article] [PubMed]

34. Zhang WL, Lu GW. Changes of adenosine and its A(1) receptor in hypoxic preconditioning. Biol Signals Recept 1999;8:275–280.
[Article] [PubMed]

35. Ginis I, Jaiswal R, Klimanis D, Liu J, Greenspon J, Hallenbeck JM. TNF-alpha-induced tolerance to ischemic injury involves differential control of NF-kappaB transactivation: the role of NFkappaB association with p300 adaptor. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab 2002;22:142–152.
[Article] [PubMed]

Fig. 1

Propidium iodide fluorescence image (×40). A single researcher measured the individual areas of the cornu ammonis 1 (CA1), CA3, and dentate gyrus (DG). Scale bar=400 µm.

Fig. 2

Propidium iodide fluorescence images and still images of hippocampal slices at 24 hours after hypoxic injury. Seven-day-cultured slices were exposed to 10% O₂ for 60 minutes (B). Fourteen-day-cultured slices were also exposed to 10% O₂ for 60 minutes (D). Panels A and C are controls. Most hypoxia-exposed groups showed a tendency towards less damage compared to the control group. DIV, days in vitro. Scale bar=400 µm.

Fig. 3

Percentage of cell death in the 7 days in vitro group, as measured by propidium iodide fluorescence. CA, cornu ammonis; DG, dentate gyrus.

Fig. 4

Percentage of cell death in the 14 days in vitro group, as measured by propidium iodide fluorescence. CA, cornu ammonis; DG, dentate gyrus.