Warning: fopen(/home/virtual/pediatrics/journal/upload/ip_log/ip_log_2026-01.txt) [function.fopen]: failed to open stream: Permission denied in /home/virtual/pediatrics/journal/ip_info/view_data.php on line 93

Warning: fwrite(): supplied argument is not a valid stream resource in /home/virtual/pediatrics/journal/ip_info/view_data.php on line 94
Beyond COVID-19: meeting the challenge of evolving pediatric invasive group A streptococcal disease

Volume 68(12); December

< Previous     Next >

Article Contents

Clin Exp Pediatr > Volume 68(12); 2025
Kim: Beyond COVID-19: meeting the challenge of evolving pediatric invasive group A streptococcal disease
The resurgence of pediatric invasive Streptococcus pyogenes (group A Streptococcus [iGAS]) infections after the coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic has drawn attention worldwide [1]. It has been reported in several countries, including the United Kingdom, Spain, Japan, and the United States, with the emergence of hypervirulent emm1 and emm12 lineages, particularly the M1UK variant. In Korea, a recent national research report documented a substantial postpandemic resurgence of GAS infections, with scarlet fever cases increasing by more than tenfold from 2022 to 2024, the majority occurring in children under 10 years of age [2]. The report identified 383 iGAS cases between 2015 and 2024, with an estimated mortality rate of approximately 14%, including the detection of the M1UK lineage in 2020 and 2024. This postpandemic pattern reflects both an “immunity gap” from prolonged infection control measures and possible strain evolution leading to increased toxin-mediated disease.
Buricchi et al. [3] recently provided valuable insights from an Italian tertiary pediatric center, where 46 children with confirmed or probable iGAS were analyzed over 2 years, from September 2022 to September 2024. Pneumonia with pleural effusion or empyema was the predominant presentation; 35% required pediatric intensive care, and the mortality rate reached 4.3%. The study highlighted that while standard β-lactam and clindamycin therapy remains central, linezolid and intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIG) as alternative or adjunctive treatments are becoming increasingly relevant in refractory or severe cases.
Table 1 summarizes the current antibiotic and adjunctive therapeutic strategies for invasive S. pyogenes infections, highlighting the evolving roles of toxin-targeted agents and immunomodulatory approaches. While β-lactams remain universally effective, increasing attention is warranted for emerging pbp2x mutations associated with modest increases in minimum inhibitory concentrations [4]. Protein synthesis inhibitors, particularly clindamycin and linezolid, play essential roles in suppressing toxins and in lung involvement. β-lactam plus clindamycin combination therapy remains the cornerstone for invasive S. pyogenes infections, particularly in cases of necrotizing fasciitis and streptococcal toxic shock syndrome (STSS). The toxin-suppressive properties of clindamycin have been demonstrated in experimental and clinical settings, and extensive multicenter cohort analyses have confirmed lower mortality rates with its adjunctive use [5]. More recently, linezolid has emerged as a viable alternative with comparable efficacy and better tolerability for toxin-driven or pulmonary presentations [6]. In the cohort of Buricchi et al. [3], linezolid was successfully used in cases refractory to β-lactams and clindamycin, supporting its role as a secondary adjunct in pediatric iGAS.
IVIG has long been used in STSS because of its ability to neutralize superantigens and modulate immune dysregulation. A landmark European randomized trial by Darenberg et al. [7] suggested a trend toward a survival benefit despite limited power. A subsequent meta-analysis by Parks et al. [8] further indicated that polyspecific IVIG combined with clindamycin reduced mortality rates in STSS. In children, recent feasibility trials demonstrated that early administration (within 6–12 hours of shock recognition) is logistically achievable and may improve outcomes [9]. The finding of Buricchi et al. [3] that delayed IVIG use in irreversible shock failed to confer benefits echoes this principle. However, pediatric evidence remains limited, and further studies are warranted to determine optimal timing and patient selection. The use of corticosteroids, which are sometimes used to treat hyperinflammation, is not supported by consistent pediatric evidence and should not be routinely chosen.
Elevated C-reactive protein and procalcitonin (PCT) levels, as demonstrated by Buricchi et al. [3], can aid early identification of children at risk of intensive care admission. Meta-analyses further support PCT's superior diagnostic performance for invasive bacterial infections [10]. These markers can complement, although not replace, clinical judgment and microbiological confirmation.
The postpandemic reemergence of pediatric iGAS underscores the need to adapt surveillance and therapeutic paradigms. Evidence from Italy and other regions converges on a model of individualized, toxin-targeted therapy anchored in β-lactams, enhanced by protein synthesis inhibitors such as linezolid, and supplemented by timely immunomodulation when indicated. Continued international collaboration and pediatric-specific trials are essential for translating these evolving strategies into standardized evidence-based care. Advances in rapid diagnostics to support antibiotic stewardship and the progress of multiple GAS vaccine candidates entering early clinical evaluations represent essential opportunities. Focused efforts to refine pediatric diagnostic and therapeutic pathways and establish the safety and immunogenicity profiles of future vaccines are critical for reducing the global burden of GAS.

Footnotes

Conflicts of interest

No potential conflict of interest relevant to this article was reported.

Author contribution

HWK is the only contributing author listed for this manuscript.

Table 1.
Summary of current therapeutic strategies for invasive group A Streptococcus (iGAS) infections
Therapeutic components β-lactam antibiotics Protein synthesis inhibitors (antitoxin adjuncts) Immunomodulatory therapy
Representative agents and regimens Penicillin G (100,000–300,000 IU/kg/day IV q4–6h), ampicillin, cefotaxime, ceftriaxone Clindamycin (20–40 mg/kg/day IV q6-8h), Linezolid (10 mg/kg IV/PO q8h) IVIG 1 g/kg day 1 → 0.5 g/kg
Days 2–3 (total 1.5–2 g/kg), corticosteroids (limited evidence)
Mechanism/rationale Inhibits cell wall synthesis via PBP binding; bactericidal Blocks 50S ribosomal subunit → suppresses exotoxin and M protein synthesis Neutralizes superantigens; modulates cytokine storm
Key clinical role First-line for all confirmed/suspected iGAS Adjunct to β-lactam in toxin-mediated disease; linezolid as rescue/alternative Early use (<6–12 hr) in STSS or refractory shock
Considerations Resistance rare; early use crucial within sepsis bundle Excellent lung penetration; oral step-down feasible Pediatric dosing essential; monitor for overload and hemolysis
PBP2x variants show mild MIC rise but remain susceptible [4] Clindamycin improved survival [5]; linezolid noninferior in emulation study [6] IVIG RCT trend toward benefit [7]; mortality reduction in meta-analysis [8]; pediatric feasibility supported [9]

IVIG, intravenous immunoglobulin; IV/PO, intravenous/per oral; PBP, penicillin-binding protein; STSS, streptococcal toxic shock syndrome; MIC, minimun inhibitory concentrations; RCT, randomized controlled trial.

References

1. Karapati E, Tsantes AG, Iliodromiti Z, Boutsikou T, Paliatsiou S, Domouchtsidou A, et al. Group A Streptococcus infections in children: epidemiological insights before and after the COVID-19 pandemic. Pathogens 2024;13:1007.
crossref pmid pmc
2. Lee HJ. Surveillance system for invasive group A streptococcus in Korea. Research Service Report. Report No.: 2024-K01-070. Cheongju (Korea): Korea Disease Control and Prevention Agency, 2025.

3. Buricchi L, Indolfi G, Renni M, Venturini E, Galli L, Chiappini E. Evolving treatment strategies for invasive Streptococcus pyogenes in children in the postpandemic era. Clin Exp Pediatr 2025;68:921-31.
crossref pmid pmc pdf
4. Chochua S, Metcalf B, Li Z, Mathis S, Tran T, Rivers J, et al. Invasive group A streptococcal penicillin binding protein 2× variants associated with reduced susceptibility to β-lactam antibiotics in the United States, 2015-2021. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 2022;66:e0080222.
crossref pmid pmc pdf
5. Babiker A, Li X, Lai YL, Strich JR, Warner S, Sarzynski S, et al. Effectiveness of adjunctive clindamycin in β-lactam antibiotic-treated patients with invasive β-haemolytic streptococcal infections in US hospitals: a retrospective multicentre cohort study. Lancet Infect Dis 2021;21:697-710.
crossref pmid
6. Babiker A, Warner S, Li X, Chishti EA, Saad E, Swihart BJ, et al. Adjunctive linezolid versus clindamycin for toxin inhibition in β-lactam-treated patients with invasive group A streptococcal infections in 195 US hospitals from 2016 to 2021: a retrospective cohort study with target trial emulation. Lancet Infect Dis 2025;25:265-75.
crossref pmid
7. Darenberg J, Ihendyane N, Sjölin J, Aufwerber E, Haidl S, Follin P, et al. Intravenous immunoglobulin G therapy in streptococcal toxic shock syndrome: a European randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. Clin Infect Dis 2003;37:333-40.
crossref pmid
8. Parks T, Wilson C, Curtis N, Norrby-Teglund A, Sriskandan S. Polyspecific intravenous immunoglobulin in clindamycin-treated patients with streptococcal toxic shock syndrome: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Clin Infect Dis 2018;67:1434-36.
crossref pmid pmc
9. Portefaix A, Dhelens C, Recher M, Cour-Andlauer F, Naudin J, Mortamet G, et al. High-dose intravenous immunoglobulin versus albumin 4% in paediatric toxic shock syndrome: a randomised controlled feasibility study. Arch Dis Child 2024;109:717-23.
crossref pmid pmc
10. Norman-Bruce H, Umana E, Mills C, Mitchell H, McFetridge L, McCleary D, et al. Diagnostic test accuracy of procalcitonin and C-reactive protein for predicting invasive and serious bacterial infections in young febrile infants: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Lancet Child Adolesc Health 2024;8:358-68.
crossref pmid
METRICS Graph View
  • 0 Crossref
  •  0 Scopus
  • 966 View
  • 31 Download


3.3154