Introduction
Neurofibromatosis type 1 (NF1) is a multisystem disorder primarily involving the skin and nervous system
1). The manifestations of NF1 are extremely variable, even within a family
2). Almost one half of all affected individuals have
de novo mutations
2). The criteria for diagnosis of NF1, developed by a National Institutes of Health (NIH) Consensus Conference in 1987, are established for routine clinical use
3). The formal diagnosis of NF1 is made in an individual who has two or more of the following features in the absence of another diagnosis: Six or more Café-au-lait spots; freckling in the axillary or inguinal regions; two or more neurofibromas of any type or one plexiform neurofibroma (PNF); optic pathway gliomas; two or more Lisch nodules; distinctive bony lesions; or a first-degree family relative with NF1 as defined by the above criteria
3). In addition, NF1 mutational analysis can clarify the diagnosis and will be helpful in describing the characteristics of molecular genetics of
NF1 mutations
4).
In this study we sought to investigate various clinical manifestations and molecular genetic characteristics in Korean patients with NF1.
Discussion
This study was performed to delineate phenotypic characterization and assess the NF1 mutational spectrum in patients with NF1. Recently, a number of correlations have been suggested, including: a mild of café-au-lait spots only in patients with an in-frame deletion; a more severe general phenotype in patients with nonsense mutations; patients with NF1 with a 1.4 Mb microduplication with mild learning difficulties, teeth and hair characteristics
4,
5). In this study, patient 4 with a novel missense mutation (p.L1773P) showed mild mental retardation, macrodontia and increased caries which could be shown in patients with NF1 with a 1.4 Mb microduplication. In addition, most of patients (2/3) with a nonsense mutation had a mild phenotype, except for one case with the severe phenotype. This result might suggest the complexity of the phenotype.
Recent papers have reported that various clinical characteristics of NF1 might occur by more elements instead of a single gene, of which two modifier genes (
GDNF,
TLF) have been found
6). Some features of NF1 may be present at birth and others are age-related manifestations. In this study, the incidence of Lisch nodules was low (16.7%). Lisch nodules increase in frequency with age and usually develop in early adolescence
2). Young et al.
7) reported that only 38% of children younger than 10 years had Lisch nodules, comparing with 77% of patients between 11 and 20 years and 94% of patients older than 21 years. The low frequency rate of Lisch nodules in this study may due to skewed distribution of age, 60% of patients younger than 11 years. In this study, there was no difference in the clinical features between children and adult patients, except for skin-fold freckling. Skin-fold freckling was more frequent in individuals over 18 years compared to individuals under 18 years (90.1% vs. 38.7%). Young children with NF1 may have only a few skinfold freckling in the axillary or inguinal regions and very young children may not show it, while older children and adults often have clusters of freckles and freckling in almost 90%
8). This is the most observed in the axillary and inguinal regions, but can also be founded in submammary regions in women, in the back of the neck, or under the chin
8). There might be several assumptions about low incidence rate of skin-fold freckling in patients under 18 years. The first, all patients under 5 years had no skin-fold freckling. So that skin-fold freckling occurred in twelve patients (60%) of ages between 6 and 18 years. The second, there might have statistically bias on cutoff of the age in dividing into two groups. The third, skin-fold freckling could be also observed in inguinal region and submammary regions. However, it is often overlooked in adolescent patients due to the reluctance of examination. To better understand of the difference of clinical presentation on according to age, it is important to have regular and periodic examination on patients.
The
NF1 gene, located on the long arm of chromosome 17 at band 11.2, spans over 60 exons distributed over more than 300 Kb
9,
10). The gene is considered to be a tumor suppressor gene and inactivation of neurofibromin leads to a disruption in cell growth regulation
11). The
NF1 gene shows high mutation rates regarding those observed in most other comparable inherited disease genes, and
de novo mutations make up to almost 50% cases
12). In this study, among seven patients tested with the
NF1 gene, all patients had seven distinct mutations; two of these mutations were known mutations and five mutations were novel mutations. The putative functional relevance and pathogenicity of the two novel missense mutations (p.Leu1773Pro and p.His1170Leu) identified in the present study were predicted
in silico using a MutationTaster software. The two novel missense mutations were predicted to affect shortened protein product or truncated protein product and to be disease-causing mutations and were not found in dbSNP (dbSNP137) and KPGP information (
http://opengenome.net/). Jeong et al.
13) reported that the mutation were evenly distributed across exon 3 through intron 47 of the
NF1 gene with a novel mutation-detection rate (61.9%) in Korean patients. Ko et al.
14) also reported that the mutations were equally distributed across exon 1 through intron 47 with a novel mutation-detection rate (30.8%), and no mutational hot spots were detected. This analysis revealed a wide spectrum of
NF1 mutations in Korean patients and a genotype-phenotype analysis suggests that there is no clear relationship between specific mutations and clinical features. In this study,
NF1 mutation are evenly distributed over the entire (exon 17-exon 51) with a novel mutation-detection rate (71.4%) and hot spot was not discovered.
PNFs are associated with severity of disease and occur in 25% of patients with NF1
15). Prada et al.
5) reported that pediatric patients with NF1 and PNFs had a higher mortality rate (3.2%) and suggested that nonsense mutations may predict a more severe general phenotype, which could include higher risk for PNFs. Among four patients with PNFs in this study, only one patient underwent genetic testing result in a novel nonsense mutation (p.Cys2371X). The patient had asymptomatic multiple nodular PNFs in the posterior neck, back, and right anterior nasal cavity and no combined complication or need for surgical intervention. However, Grobmyer et al.
16) reported that PNFs can transform to MPNST with an estimated lifetime risk for patients with NF1 of approximately 10%. In the present study, malignancy-related death in the PNF group included hypovolemic shock caused by a massive hemothorax from a large thoracic MPNST during follow-up. Evans et al.
17) reported that many patients with MPNST have nonresectable disease at diagnosis; Overall survival rate of affected individuals at 5 and 10 years was 20%-50% and 7.5%, respectively. Therefore, comprehensive evaluation, including genetic testing, in patients with NF1 might be helpful in prediction of high-risk group of tumor development.
NF1 is associated with some malignancies including, rhabdomyosarcoma, leukemia, and other brain tumors
17). In this study, all tumor were benign, apart from MPNST, of which hamartoma was the most common tumor (20%). However, Listernick et al.
18) reported that the most common tumor in children with NF1 was the optic glioma, which was seen in 15% to 20% of patients. Although optic glioma in many patients with NF1 exhibit indolent behavior, approximately one-third to half of these tumors will cause clinical symptoms, including vision loss and precocious puberty
18). In the present study, both of our patients presented with symptomatic optic glioma, including sudden onset visual loss and exophthalmos in whom two missense mutations, p.Leu1773Pro and p.Gly629Arg, were detected, respectively. This study has a limitation of the small number of patients who underwent genetic testing. Therefore, genotype-phenotype correlation in NF1 seems to be difficult to interpret. Additional molecular genetics study for large-scale national patients with NF1 and further functional and structural research of each
NF1 mutation in specific regions are required.
In summary, the clinical manifestations of 42 Korean patients with NF1 were extremely variable and the mutations of the NF1 gene were genetically heterogeneous with high a novel mutation-detection rate (71.4%). It is hoped that these data will contribute to a better understanding of the distinct molecular genetic characteristics of patients with NF1, and to expand the global pool of NF1 reports.